Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Sep 16;1456(1):44–63. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14233

Figure 3. An allelic series of gpr126 parses direct versus indirect compound function.

Figure 3.

(A) Molecular structure for screen hits (PubChem). (B) Schematic of gpr126 alleles, predicted proteins, phenotypes, and predicted drug functions based on mbp restoration. (C-U) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for mbp in wild-type (WT) or gpr126. Black arrows indicate PLLn. Fraction of gpr126 larvae with increased mbp is noted in upper right of each image. (C-G) mbp expression in control larvae. Note absence of PLLn mbp in gpr126stl47, gpr126st49, and gpr126stl215 (D-F) and reduction in gpr126st63 (G). (H-L) PLLn mbp expression is partially restored in gpr126st49 (J), gpr126stl215 (K), and gpr126st63 (L) in 10 μM undecylenic acid. (M-Q) PLLn mbp is weakly increased in one larva for gpr126st49 (O) and gpr126stl215 (P) but strongly increased in gpr126st63 (Q) with 10 μM naloxone. (R-U) mbp PLLn expression is increased across all alleles in 5 μM telmisartan-treated larvae.