Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses between imaging parameters and inflammation grade [in 35 patients with CD and 40 ileal segments analysed].

Parameter	Univariate		Multivariate
	OR [CI 95%]	p	OR [CI 95%]	p
Length of involved bowel	1.17 [0.99-1.39]	0.068
Pattern of enhancement at 25 s*	8.000 [1.73-37.09]	0.008	3.901 [0.221-68.94]	0.353
Pattern of enhancement at 60 s	4.125 [1.02-16.67]	0.047	3.195 [0.13-79.54]	0.514
Pattern of enhancement at 180 s**	0.965 [0.192-4.84]	0.965
Degree of enhancement at 60 s	6.417 [1.33-3.03]	0.021	23.511 [1.22-453.71]	0.037
Ulceration	3.857 [1-14.92]	0.05
Fistula	3.556 [0.92-13.70]	0.065
Abscess	2.250 [0.59-10.14]	0.291
Comb sign	2.528 [0.45-14.20]	0.292
Upstream dilation	1.312 [0.36-4.78]	0.680
Enhancement ratio at 25 s*	1.003 [0.99-1.01]	0.421
Enhancement ratio at 60 s	1.006 [1.00-1.02]	0.260
Enhancement ratio at 180 s**	1.005 [0.99-1.02]	0.397
ADC*	0.005 [0-0.478]	0.022	0.001 [0-1.33]	0.060
Wall thickness on T1W post-contrast	1.439 [1.04-2]	0.030	1.048 [0.66-1.67]	0.844
Wall thickness on T2WI	1.289 [0.91-1.83]	0.157
MaRIa score	1.125 [1.02-1.25]	0.022
Clermont score	1.096 [0.98-1.23]	0.111

Significant p-values are bolded.

OR, odds ratio; CI 95%, 95% confidence intervals.

*Not available in five patients.

**Not available in two patients