Table 5.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression between imaging parameters and degree of oedema [in 35 patients with CD and 40 ileal segments analysed].

Parameter	Univariate		Multivariate
	OR [CI 95%]	p	OR [CI 95%]	p
Length of involved bowel	1.004 [0.89-1.13]	0.953
Pattern of enhancement at 25 s*	0.750[0.193-2.92]	0.678
Pattern of enhancement at 60 s	0.545 [0.16-1.91]	0.344
Pattern of enhancement at 180 s**	0.525 [0.11-2.60]	0.430
Degree of enhancement at 60 s	1.715 [0.66-4.44]	0.267
Ulceration	6.000 [1.46-24.69]	0.013	8.389 [1.55-45.50]	0.014
Fistula	2.786 [0.77-10.04]	0.117
Abscess	2.667 [0.65-10.97]	0.174
Comb sign	1.333 [0.30-5.93]	0.705
Upstream dilation	0.815 [0.23-2.86]	0.749
Enhancement ratio at 25 s*	0.994 [0.99-1.00]	0.208
Enhancement ratio at 60 s	0.995 [0.99-1.01]	0.296
Enhancement ratio at 180 s	0.995 [0.98-1.01]	0.354
ADC*	2.683 [0.11-66.91]	0.548
Wall thickness on T1W post-contrast	1.260 [0.96-1.66]	0.100
Wall thickness on T2WI	1.099 [0.816-1.48]	0.537
MaRIa score	1.088 [1-1.19]	0.063
Clermont score	1.184 [1.03-1.36]	0.015

Significant p-values are bolded.

OR, odds ratio; CI 95%, 95% confidence intervals.

*Not available in five patients

**Not available in two patients