Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 2;12(6):718–729. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx186

Table 9.

ROC analysis for differentiating grade 1 versus grade 2/3 inflammation, oedema, and prominent muscle hypertrophy versus prominent fibrosis.

Parameter Inflammation Oedema Prominent muscle hypertrophy versus prominent fibrosis
AUC p Cut-off Se Sp AUC p Cut-off Se Sp AUC p Cutoff Se Sp
Length of involved bowel 0.7 0.036 4.5 mm 88% 60% 0.527 0.766 0.713 0.054
Wall thickness on T2WI 0.64 0.142 0.527 0.766 0.742 0.029 7.4 mm 61% 89%
Wall thickness on T1WI post-contrast 0.725 0.018 5.9 mm 72% 73% 0.651 0.102 0.711 0.056
ADC 0.728 0.029 1.11 × 10-3 mm2/s 70% 75% 0.602 0.305 0.556 0.637
MaRIA score 0.736 0.013 26.1 96% 53% 0.697 0.032 23.5 90% 50% 0.71 0.058
Clermont score 0.667 0.11 0.776 0.005 28.7 90% 63% 0.727 0.054

Significant p-values are bolded.

Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; AUC, area under the curve.