Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;368:l6925. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6925

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in systematic review of industry funding of patient groups

Study* Location of study sample No of patient groups† Disease focus‡ Year of data collection Data collection methods§ Publication type Funding source Author conflicts of interest¶
Abola 2016a US 68 Cancer 2015-16 Websites Peer reviewed journal Not reported Not reported
Abola 2016b US 58 Cancer 2015 FDA meeting transcripts Peer reviewed journal Not reported No
Anonymous 2003 UK 125 Multiple Not reported Websites Lay press Non-profit Not reported
Baggott 2005 UK 123/186 (66%) Multiple 1999 Questionnaires Academic book Government Not reported
Baggott 2014** UK 122/312 (39%) Multiple 2010 Questionnaires Peer reviewed journal Not reported Not reported
Ball 2006 Various (US, UK, Australia, Canada and South Africa) 69 Multiple 2005 Websites Peer reviewed journal No funding received No
Claypool 2016 US 147 Multiple 2016 Websites (patient groups and pharmaceutical companies), transparency databases Report Not reported Not reported
Colombo 2012 Italy 157 Multiple 2010 Websites (patient groups and pharmaceutical companies) Peer reviewed journal Non-profit No
García-Sempere 2005 Spain 21/38 (55%) Multiple 2003-04 Questionnaires Peer reviewed journal Government Not reported
Hemminki 2010 Finland Questionnaires: 55/85 (65%); websites: 13 Multiple 2003 Questionnaires, websites Peer reviewed journal Government No
Jones 2008 UK 246 Multiple 2007 Websites (patient groups and pharmaceutical companies) Peer reviewed journal Government Not reported
Jørgensen 2004 Various (Australia, Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, UK, US) 16 (n=13 advocacy groups; n=3 consumer groups) Breast cancer 2002 (websites, funding information); 1998 (pamphlets, some positions) Websites, follow-up queries to patient groups, patient information pamphlets Peer reviewed journal No funding received No
Kopp 2018 US 1215 Multiple 2015 Websites (patient groups and pharmaceutical companies), tax records Report Non-profit No
Lin 2017 US 30; questionnaire: 26/30 (87%) Multiple 2016 Websites, tax records; questionnaires, annual reports Peer reviewed journal Not reported No
Marshall 2006 US 29 Multiple 2006 Websites, tax records, questionnaires Lay press Media (New Scientist) Not reported
McCoy 2017 US 104 Multiple 2016 Tax records, websites Peer reviewed journal Not reported Yes
Mosconi 2003 Italy 67 Breast cancer 1998-99 Questionnaires Peer reviewed journal Non-profit No
O’Donovan 2007†† Ireland 112/167 (67%) Multiple 2004 Questionnaires Peer reviewed journal Non-profit Not reported
Perehudoff 2010 Europe 23 Multiple 2010 Websites (patient groups and pharmaceutical companies), Google searches, direct email communication with patient groups Report Government and non-profit No
Perehudoff 2011 Europe Questionnaire: 12/22 (55%); policy analysis: 14/22 (64%) Multiple 2009-10 Websites (patient groups and pharmaceutical companies), questionnaires, published policies Report Government and non-profit No
Pinto 2016 Australia 61/114 (54%) Rare diseases 2013-14 Questionnaires Peer reviewed journal No funding received No
Rose 2017 US 289/439 (66%) Multiple 2013-14 Questionnaires Peer reviewed journal Non-profit Yes
Rothman 2011 US 161 Multiple 2007-09 Websites, pharmaceutical company’s grant registry Peer reviewed journal Non-profit Not reported
Schubert 2006 Germany 8 Multiple Not reported Websites, questionnaires and interviews, magazines from patient groups Report Not reported Not reported
van Rijn van Alkmade 2005 The Netherlands 96/219 (44%) Multiple 2004 Questionnaires, annual reports Report Government Not reported
Vitry 2011 Australia 135 Multiple 2011 Websites (patient groups and pharmaceutical companies) Conference presentation Non-profit Not reported

FDA=US Food and Drug Administration.

*

Study design: all cross sectional.

Number of patient groups included in our analysis; some studies included several samples. Response rate given if applicable.

The term “multiple” for disease focus is used for studies that focused on patient groups that work on a range of clinical areas.

§

Some studies used several data collection methods (eg, website analyses, questionnaires, interviews); only those used to collect data included in this systematic review are reported. If not further specified, websites and questionnaires refer to patient groups as a data source.

Only with pharmaceutical or device industries.

**

Baggott 2014 describes two studies, one of which is described in greater detail in Baggott 2005 (see row above); the listing for Baggott 2014 in this table covers only the second study.

††

A less comprehensive version of the same study conducted in 2005 was also identified.