Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;368:m549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m549

Table 4.

Risk of tuberculosis (TB) in contacts tested with both the tuberculin skin test and an interferon-gamma release assay (all types). Tuberculin skin test considered positive if ≥10 mm

Group comparison No of studies No of participants Total (mean) person years follow-up Active TB events (%)* TB rate per 1000 person years (95% CI)† Incidence rate ratio (95% CI)† I2 (%)
General population, TST positive‡ 3 33 811 249 093 (7.4) 55 (0.2) 0.3 (0.1 to 1.1) - -
Dual positive v dual negative
IGRA positive and TST positive v IGRA negative and TST negative§ 4 588 v 2724 1576 (2.7) v 5856 (2.1) 36 (8.7) v 15 (0.6) 30.6 (10.9 to 85.9) v 2.6 (1.2 to 5.6) 19.1 (2.9 to 127.3) 80
Dual positive v discordant (positive/negative)
IGRA positive and TST positive v IGRA positive and TST negative¶ 3 566 v 476 1464 (2.6) v 956 (2.0) 34 (8.8) v 29 (3.3) 37.3 (10.5 to 132.4) v 16.5 (3.7 to 74.8) 3.0 (0.2 to 40.7) 83
IGRA positive and TST positive v IGRA negative and TST positive** 6 641 v 1428 1715 (2.7) v 4410 (3.1) 47 (12.1) v 29 (1.8) 43.1 (21.1 to 88.0) v 6.2 (2.4 to 15.9) 7.6 (1.6 to 36.7) 86
Discordant (positive/negative) v dual negative
IGRA positive and TST negative v IGRA negative and TST negative†† 3 476 v 2643 956 (2.0) v 5541 (2.1) 29 (3.3) v 15 (0.7) 16.5 (3.7 to 74.8) v 3.1 (1.4 to 6.6) 5.1 (2.4 to 10.8) 0
IGRA negative and TST positive v IGRA negative and TST negative‡‡ 4 672 v 2724 1534 (2.3) v 5856 (2.1) 18 (2.4) v 15 (0.6) 9.1 (3.0 to 28.0) v 2.6 (1.2 to 5.6) 3.6 (1.8 to 7.2) 0

TST=tuberculin skin test; IGRA=interferon-gamma release assay; N/A=not applicable.

*

Percentage represents pooled cumulative incidence estimated from random effects meta-analysis.

Pooled estimates using random effects meta-analysis.

Data provided for reference. Populations are from British Columbia and Saskatchewan, Canada, and Florida, USA.

§

One study used the T-SPOT.TB IGRA, whereas the remaining three used the QFT-GIT (QuantiFERON Gold-In-Tube) IGRA. One study, using QFT-GIT, was exclusively in contacts aged <18 years.

One study used the T-SPOT.TB IGRA, whereas the remaining two used the QFT-GIT IGRA. One study, using QFT-GIT, was exclusively in contacts aged <18 years.

**

One study used the T-SPOT.TB IGRA, whereas the remaining five used the QFT-GIT IGRA. Two studies, using QFT-GIT, were exclusively in contacts aged <18 years.

††

One study used the T-SPOT.TB IGRA, whereas the remaining two used the QFT-GIT IGRA. One study, using QFT-GIT, was exclusively in contacts aged <18 years.

‡‡

One study used the T-SPOT.TB IGRA, whereas the remaining three used the QFT-GIT IGRA. One study, using QFT-GIT, was exclusively in contacts aged <18 years.