Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: FEBS J. 2019 Nov 19;287(9):1886–1898. doi: 10.1111/febs.15113

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Charge engineering of the NpuDnaE intein. (A) Charge distributions of the NpuDnaE and the Charge-Swapped NpuDnaE (CS-NpuDnaE) inteins corresponding to strands β3 and β6 in the gp41–1 intein structure. Color-coded arrows indicate the pairs of split inteins tested for trans-splicing in panel C with lines. (B) Cis-splicing analysis of the CS-NpuDnaE intein by SDS-PAGE. M, 0h, 3h, and E stand for molecular markers, 0 hours, 3 hours after induction, and elution from Ni-NTA spin columns. A red arrow indicates the band corresponding to the cis-spliced H6-GB1-GB1 product. A repesentative gel of three individual experiments is shown. (C) Cross-activity between split NpuDnaE and CS-NpuDnaE inteins. SDS-PAGE analysis of trans-splicing for three different pairs of split inteins, CS-NpuDnaEN/CS-NpuDnaEC (left), CS-NpuDnaEN/NpuDnaEC (middle), and NpuDnaEN/CS-NpuDnaEC (right), which are illustrated by arrows and lines in panel A. N, L, and C denote the N-terminal fragment with IntN, the ligated product, and the C-terminal fragment with IntC, respectively. I, A, I+A, and E stand for IPTG induction, arabinose induction, both IPTG and arabinose induction, and elution from Ni-NTA spin columns. IPTG induction produces the N-terminal precursor fragment, N. Arabinose induces the protein expression of the C-terminal precursor, C. Only dual induction by IPTG and arabinose (I+A) is expected to produce the ligated product, L by protein trans-splicing. A repesentative gel of two individual experiments for each combination is shown.