Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;33(5):905–915. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0418-2

Table 3.

Tumor heterogeneity.

Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Combineda
Cytoplasmic BUB3
 n 210 210 196 213
 Negative 182 182 138 137
 Heterogeneous NA NA NA 63
 Positive 28 28 58 13
 p valueb 0.089 <0.001 0.001 <0.001
 HR (95% CI) 1.71 (0.91–3.21) 3.12 (1.83–5.30) 2.29 (1.41–3.73)

2.12 (1.28–3.50)

4.46 (2.14–9.29)

Nuclear BUB3
 n 210 210 196 213
 Positive 157 141 139 96
 Heterogeneous NA NA NA 103
 Reduced 53 69 57 14
 p valueb 0.518 0.018 0.152 0.024
 HR (95% CI) 1.20 (0.70–2.06) 1.71 (1.09–2.68) 1.44 (0.87–2.40)

1.38 (0.84–2.28)

2.91 (1.31–6.46)

CCNB1
 n 221 207 214 223
 Negative 152 157 173 136
 Heterogeneous NA NA NA 62
 Positive 69 50 41 25
 p valueb <0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 HR (95% CI) 2.94 (1.86–4.63) 2.33 (1.42–3.82) 2.51 (1.51–4.19)

2.67 (1.62–4.40)

3.82 (1.99–7.31)

PTTG1
 n 214 201 209 221
 Negative 149 152 167 124
 Heterogeneous NA NA NA 77
 Positive 65 49 42 20
 p valueb 0.036 0.041 0.014 0.012
 HR (95% CI) 1.65 (1.03–2.64) 1.68 (1.04–2.73) 1.95 (1.14–3.34)

1.55 (0.95–2.52)

2.69 (1.33–5.44)

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, NA not available

aPatients were included in the combined analyses when a patient had ≥2 valid samples, a tumor was considered heterogeneous when both positive and negative scores were observed

bLog-rank p value