Table 2.
GLMM analyses evaluating relationship between stereotypies and measures of reproductive performance in male giant pandas.
| # Locomotor stereotypies/min (β, Wald χ2, p) | # Non-locomotor stereotypies/min (β, Wald χ2, p) | Stereotypy Present 1,0 (β, Wald χ2, p) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Successful intromissions (1/0; N = 213) | 1.11, | 1.42, | 0.06 | −0.63, | −0.50, | 0.62 | −0.01, | −1.64, | 0.10 |
| Cubs produced (1/0; N = 92) | 9.88, | 2.23, | 0.03 | −0.44, | −1.11, | 0.27 | 0.01, | 1.30, | 0.19 |
| Number of cubs (N = 71) | 0.10, | 0.48, | 0.63 | 0.14, | 0.87, | 0.38 | 0.19, | 0.70, | 0.48 |
| Male sex ratio (N = 71) | 0.90, | 5.82, | <0.001 | 0.08, | 0.32, | 0.74 | 1.43, | 4.15, | <0.001 |
Significant relationships p < 0.05 (adjusted for inflated Type I errors using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) are indicated in bold type while trends p < 0.08 are indicated in italics.