. 2020 Apr 29;10:7244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64335-3

Table 5.

Concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number abnormalities between corresponding miPGT-1(WGA with cell lysis), miPGT-2 (WGA without cell lysis) and TE samples.

Type of samples	Ploidy status (%)		Gender (%)	Euploid embryos (%)	Aneuploid embryos (%)
Type of samples	Per sample	Per chromosome	Gender (%)	Euploid embryos (%)	Aneuploid embryos (%)
miPGT-1 vs. TE	37/38 (97.4)*	888/912 (97.4)*	38/38 (100)	23/24 (95.8)*	14/15 (93.3)*
miPGT-2 vs. TE	35/36 (97.2)*	840/864 (97.2)*	36/36 (100)	22/23 (95.7)*	13/14 (92.9)*
miPGT-1 vs. miPGT-2	38/38 (100)*	912/912 (100)*	38/38 (100)	24/24 (100)*	14/14 (100)*

Ploidy status – euploid or aneuploidy.

Aneuploid – whole/segmental chromosome aneuploidy.

*Not statistically significant difference between the values in the same column.