Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;10:598. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00598

Table 1.

Comparisons of dosimetric parameters of target volumes among the four plans in 20 patients.

PTVs Parameters 2.5FJ 2.5DJ 5.0FJ 5.0DJ P2.5 P5.0 PF PD P*
PTVnx D98% (Gy) 69.99 ± 0.19 69.99 ± 0.17 70.00 ± 0.24 69.99 ± 0.23 0.453 0.47 0.711 0.899 0.766
V100% (%) 97.96 ± 1.03 97.92 ± 1.00 97.94 ± 1.09 97.90 ± 1.08 0.176 0.494 0.706 0.688 0.263
Dmean (Gy) 71.66 ± 0.35 71.65 ± 0.35 72.00 ± 0.50 71.99 ± 0.45 0.043 0.635 0 0 0
Dmax (Gy) 74.32 ± 1.15 74.31 ± 1.15 74.54 ± 0.95 74.58 ± 0.86 0.624 0.352 0.227 0.156 0.165
CI 0.91 ± 0.02 0.91 ± 0.02 0.86 ± 0.04 0.86 ± 0.03 1 0.891 0 0 0
HI 0.042 ± 0.009 0.042 ± 0.009 0.050 ± 0.012 0.050 ± 0.012 0.297 0.577 0 0 0
PTVnd D98% (Gy) 66.11 ± 0.25 66.09 ± 0.26 65.96 ± 0.27 65.97 ± 0.23 0.119 0.947 0.011 0.012 0.003
Dmean (Gy) 66.77 ± 0.25 66.76 ± 0.25 67.98 ± 0.32 67.99 ± 0.29 0.012 0.696 0.005 0 0
Dmax (Gy) 70.74 ± 1.17 70.72 ± 1.17 71.13 ± 1.31 71.17 ± 1.27 0.032 0.53 0.008 0 0.001
PTV1 D98% (Gy) 60.39 ± 0.55 60.36 ± 0.51 60.99 ± 0.86 60.99 ± 0.83 0.056 0.904 0 0 0
V100% (%) 98.44 ± 1.27 98.41 ± 1.18 99.00 ± 1.02 99.00 ± 1.05 0.467 0.881 0 0 0
PTV2 D98% (Gy) 54.13 ± 0.42 54.13 ± 0.40 54.01 ± 0.62 53.99 ± 0.58 0.789 0.33 0.068 0.029 0.02
V100% (%) 98.20 ± 1.09 98.16 ± 1.14 97.74 ± 1.31 97.80 ± 1.21 0.088 0.419 0.001 0 0

P2.5: 2.5FJ vs. 2.5DJ; P5.0: 5.0FJ vs. 5.0DJ; PF: 2.5FJ vs. 5.0FJ; PD: 2.5DJ vs. 5.0DJ; P*: 2.5FJ vs. 5.0DJ.