Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;11:317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00317

Table 1.

Basic information of studies evaluated.

Tool acronym First author Year Place of origin Sample size Age (years) Number of questions Scale Respondent Timeframe Reference has questionnaire Steps fulfilled
AIS (5) Chung 2011 Hong Kong, China 1,516 12–19 8 three-point Likert self in the last month no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : three schools with different levels of academic achievement
ASHS (6) Storfer-Isser 2013 Boston, USA 514 16–19 32 six-point ordinal self in the past month no 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : Cleveland Children's Sleep and Health Study, a longitudinal, community-based urban cohort study
ASHS (7) de Bruin 2014 Amsterdam, Netherlands 186 normal and 112 insomnia 12–19 28 six-point rating self in the past month yes 1,2,8,9
setting : a community sample of adolescents and a sample of adolescents with insomnia (registered through a website)
ASHS (8) Chehri 2017 Basel, Switzerland 1,013 12–19 24 six-point rating self in the past month no 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10
setting : classroom – individual
ASHS (9) Lin 2018 Qazvin, Iran 389 14–18 24 six-point rating self in the past month no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
setting : classroom – individual
ASQ (10) Arroll 2011 Auckland, New Zealand 36 >15 30 mixed self mixed yes 1,2,3,4,5,6,9
setting : primary care patients
ASWS (11) Sufrinko 2015 north Carolina, USA 467 12–18 10 self no 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : classroom – individual
ASWS (12) Essner 2015 Seattle, USA 491 12–18 28 six-point Likert self previous month no 1,2,7,8,9
setting : data were pooled from five research studies with heterogeneous samples of adolescents with nondisease-related chronic pain, sickle cell disease, traumatic brain injury, or depressive disorders, as well as adolescents who were otherwise healthy, from three sites in the Northwest and Midwestern United States.
BEARS (13) Bastida-Pozuelo 2016 Murcia, Spain 60 2–16 7 yes/no parent no 1,2,4,6,9
setting : first time visit at National Spanish Health Service's mental healthcare centre
BEDS (14) Esbensen 2017 Ohio, USA 30 6–17 28 five-point Likert parent in last 6 months no 1,2,6,8,9
setting : take-home questionnaires and sleep diary
BISQ (15) Casanello 2018 Barcelona, Spain 87 3–30 months 14 mixed parent yes 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : clinic based (self-report and follow-up interview)
BRIAN-K (16) Berny 2018 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 373 7–8 17 three-point Likert parent in the last 15 days yes 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : classroom – individual
CAS-15 (17) Goldstein 2012 New York, USA 100 2–12 15 mixed clinician yes all steps except 10
setting : children referred to the pediatric otolaryngology outpatient offices for evaluation of snoring and suspected sleep disordered breathing
CBCL (18) Becker 2015 Cincinnati, OH, USA 383 6–18 7 sleep items three-point Likert parent/self no 1,2,6,8,9
setting : referred patients to tertiary-care pediatric hospital
CCTQ (19) Dursun 2015 Erzurum, Turkey 101 9–18 27 mixed parent on work and free days no 1,2,6,8,9
setting : sample from clinical (outpatient psychiatry) and community settings
CCTQ (20) Ishihara 2014 Tokyo, Japan 346 3–6 27 mixed parent on work and free days no 1,2,6,8,9
setting : mailed to parents via kindergartens
CCTQ (21) Yeung 2019 Hong Kong, China 555 7–11 27 mixed parent no 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9
setting : five primary schools in the Hong Kong SAR
CRSP (22) Cordts 2016 Kansas, USA 155 9.82 62 self no 1,2,6,7,9,10
setting : take-home questionnaire/classroom group
CRSP (23) Meltzer 2013 Denver, Colorado, USA 456 8–12 60 mixed self mixed yes 1,2,4,8,9,10
setting: primary care pediatricians' offices, an outpatient pediatric sleep clinic, community flyers and advertisements, two independent Australian schools, two different pediatric sleep laboratories, and outpatient clinics or inpatient units of a children's hospital for oncology patients
CRSP (24) Meltzer 2014 Denver, Colorado, USA 570 13–18 76 mixed self mixed no 1,2,4,7,8,9,10
setting: from several studies: pediatric sleep clinics at two separate children's hospitals, outpatient clinics and inpatient units of a children's hospital for oncology patients, two independent Australian schools, an Internet based sample of adolescents, including those with asthma (categorized in clinic group) and those without asthma (categorized in community group)
CRSP (25) Steur 2019 Amsterdam, Netherlands n= 619 general
n=34 clinic
7–12 26 (total score on 23) three-point self one week no (English items listed) 1,4,7,8,9,10,11
setting : online data collection in cooperation with the Taylor Nelson Sofres Netherlands Institute for Public Opinion, an outpatient sleep clinic
CRSP-S (26) Meltzer 2012 Denver, Colorado, USA 388 8–12 5 5-point rating self no 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : primary care pediatrician's offices: the Sleep Clinic at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), through community flyers and advertisements in the Delaware Valley, through two independent schools in Adelaide, South Australia, while waiting for an overnight polysomnography at CHOP or the Children's Hospital of Alabama, or during outpatient clinic visits or on the inpatient unit at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
CSAQ (27) Chuang 2016 Taichung, Taiwan 362 8–9 44 four-point Likert parent no all steps except 11
setting : elementary school
CSHQ (28) Markovich 2015 Halifax, Canada 30 6–12 45 (33 scored question) three-point Likert parent in the previous week no 1,2,8,9
setting : data were collected from two larger studies
CSHQ (29) Dias 2018 Braga, Portugal 299 2 weeks–12 months 48 four-point Likert parent mixed yes 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : women were contacted at the third trimester of pregnancy; send by email
CSHQ (30) Ren 2013 Beijing, China 912 6–12 33 three-point Likert parent no 1,2,6,7
setting : Parent meeting at primary and elementary students in Shenzhen
CSHQ (31) Liu 2014 Chengdu, China 3,324 3–6 33 three-point Likert parent a typical week no 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : 21 mainland Chinese cities; take-home questionnaire
CSHQ (32) Tan 2018 Shanghai, China 171 4–5 33 three-point and four-point Likert parent no 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : distributed at the schools; take-home questionnaire
CSHQ (33) Waumans 2010 Amsterdam Netherlands 1,502 5–12 33 four-point Likert parent no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10
setting : primary schools and daycare centers
CSHQ (34) Steur 2017 Amsterdam Netherlands 201 2–3 33 three-point Likert parent 1-week no 1,2,4,6,7,8,10,11
setting : online questionnaire via a Dutch market research agency
CSHQ (35) Mavroudi 2018 Thessaloniki, Greece 112 6–14 45 four-point Likert parent a “common” recent week no 1,2,8,9
setting : patients were ascertained sensitive to a variety of aeroallergens
CSHQ (36) Johnson 2016 Florida USA 310 (177+34+99) 2–10 33 a 1–3 rating + yes/no parent no 1,2,6,7,8
setting : enrolled from three study sites : 24-week, multisite randomized controlled trial of parent training (PT) versus parent education; an 8-week randomized trial of a PT program; Autism Speaks Autism Treatment Network
CSHQ (37) Sneddon 2013 Vancouver, BC, Canada 105 2–5 33 three-point Likert mother no 1,2,6,7,8,9
setting : early intervention programs, outpatient mental health clinics; general community
CSHQ (short) (38) Masakazu 2017 Tokyo, Japan 178; 432; 330 6–12 19 three-point rating parent a typical recent week no 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10
setting : different collection times/settings: elementary school; pediatric psychiatric hospital; community
CSHQ (39) Schlarb 2010 Tübingen, Germany 298;45 4–10 48 three-point + yes/no parent no 1,2,4,6,7,8,9
setting : community sample via schools, clinical sample
CSHQ (40) Silva 2014 Lisbon, Portugal 315 2–10 33 three-point rating parent a recent more typical week no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : community sample
CSHQ (41) Lucas-de la Cruz 2016 Cuenca, Spain 286 4–7 33 three-point rating parent no 1,2,4,6,7,8,9
setting : cross-over cluster randomized trial from 21 schools
CSHQ (42) Fallahzadeh 2015 Kashan, Iran 300 5–10 33 three-point rating parent no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : public and private schools
CSHQ (43) Loureiro 2013 Lisbon, Portugal 574 7–12 26 three-point Likert parent no 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : community and clinical samples
CSHQ (short) (44) Bonuck 2017 Boston, Masacheusettes 151;218 4–10; 24–66 months 23 parent no 1,2,6,9
setting : clinic sample data (two datatest were reused for this study: Owens (1997/8) and Goodlin-Jones (2003-5), respectively)
CSHQ (14) Esbensen 2017 Cincinnati, OH, USA 30 6–17 33 three-point Likert parent no 1,2,6,8,9
setting: community-based study in children with Down syndrome
CSM (45) Jankowski 2015 Warsaw, Poland 952 13–46 13 mixed self yes 1,2,4,6,8,9
setting : residents from Warsaw and Mielec districts
CSRQ (46) Dewald 2012 Amsterdam Netherlands 166; 236 12.2–16.5; 13.3–18.9 20 ordinal response categories ranging from 1 to 3 self previous 2 weeks no 1,2,4,6,7,8,10
setting : five high schools in and around Amsterdam and from five high schools in Adelaide and Outer Adelaide
CSRQ (47) Dewald-Kaufmann 2018 Amsterdam Netherlands 298 20 ordinal response categories ranging from 1 to 3 self previous 2 weeks no 1,2,9,11
setting : participants were recruited from high schools around Amsterdam; referred to the Centre for Sleep–Wake Disorders and Chronobiology of Hospital Gelderse Vallei in Ede, the Netherlands; adolescents who received cognitive behavioural therapy for their sleep onset and maintenance problems (see de Bruin et al)
CSWS (48) LeBourgeois 2016 Boulder, CO, USA 161; 485; 751; 55;85 2–8 (different across studies) 25 (different across studies) four-point (different across studies) parent no all steps except 11
setting : 5 studies with independent samples (different across studies)
DBAS (49) Lang 2017 Basel, Switzerland 864 17.9 16 10-point Likert self no 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10
setting : students in vocational education and training; in a classroom setting
DBAS (50) Blunden 2012 Queensland Australia 134 11–14 10 mixed self no 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : From sleep education intervention
ESS (51) Krishnamoorthy 2019 Puducherry, India 789 10–19 8 four-point Likert self no all steps
setting : villages of rural Puducherry, a union territory in South India
ESS (52) Crabtree 2019 Memphis, Tennessee 66 6–20 8 four-point Likert self in various everyday situations no 1,2,8,9,11
setting : children and young adults (ages 6 to 20 years) were assessed by the M-ESS after surgical resection, if performed, and before proton therapy
ESS-CHAD (53) Janssen 2017 Victoria, Australia 297 12–18 8 four-point Likert self thinking of the last two weeks no 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : Part of a broader research project; schools in regional Victoria (qualtrics survey)
FoSI (54) Brown 2019 Washington, DC, USA 147 14–18 11 five-point Likert self last month no 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : two school-based health centers in the Washington Metropolitan Area
I SLEEPY (55) Kadmon 2014 Ontairo, Canada 150 3–18 8 yes/no parent/self yes 1,2,4,5,6,9
setting : referred for evaluation at a pediatric sleep clinic
IF SLEEPY (55) Kadmon 2014 Ontairo, Canada 150 3–18 8 yes/no parent/self yes 1,2,4,5,6,9
setting : referred for evaluation at a pediatric sleep clinic
I'M SLEEPY (55) Kadmon 2014 Ontairo, Canada 150 3–18 8 yes/no parent/self yes 1,2,4,5,6,9
setting : referred for evaluation at a pediatric sleep clinic
ISI (5) Chung 2011 Hong Kong, China 1,516 12–19 8 five-point Likert self in last 2 weeks no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : three schools with different levels of academic achievement
ISI (56) Kanstrup 2014 Solna, Sweden 154 10–18 5 five-point rating self past 2 weeks no 1,2,4,6,8,9
setting : patients with chronic pain referred to a tertiary pain clinic upon first visit
ISI (57) Gerber 2016 Basel, Switzerland 1,475 adolescents, 862 university students and 533 adults 11–16 7 eight-point Likert self yes 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10
setting : 3 cross-sectional studies; via schools
JSQ (58) Kuwada 2018 Osaka, Japan 4,369; 100 6–12 38 mixed (6 point intensity rating) parent no 1,2,7,8,9,10,11
setting : 17 elementary schools; 2 pediatric sleep clinic
JSQ (preschool)
(59)
Shimizu 2014 Osaka, Japan 2,998;102 2–6 39 six-point Likert parent no 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,11
setting : private kindergarten, nursery school, and recipients of regular physical examinations at the age of 3 years; two pediatric sleep clinics
LSTCHQ (60) Garmy 2012 Lund, Sweden 116 child respondents; 44 parent respondents 6–13 11 mixed parent/self yes 1,2,4,5,8,9
setting : school-based distriution
MCTQ (61) Roenneberg 2003 Basel, Switzerland 500 (142 being <21years) 6–18 ~9* seven-point rating; mixed self free/work days yes 1,2,5,6
setting : distributed in Germany and Switzerland in high schools, universities, and the general population. This paper was added because of its relevance despite being outside the timeframe of the current review
MEQ (62) Cavallera 2015 Milan, Italy 292 11–15 17 self no 1,2,4,5,7,8,9
setting : convenience school-based samples
(r)MEQ (63) Danielsson 2019 Uppsala, Sweden 671 16–26 5 self no 1,2,6,7,8,9
setting : selected randomly from the Swedish Population Register
aMEQ (64) Rodrigues 2016 Aveiro district, Portugal 300 12–14 19 mixed self no 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,11
setting: 80% public and 20% private schools from the district of Aveiro
aMEQ-R (65) Rodrigues 2019 Aveiro district, Portugal n1=300 (same 2016)
n2= 217
12–14 10 mixed self no 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,11
setting: several schools of the Aveiro district
MESC (66) Diaz-Morales 2015 Madrid, Spain 5,387 10–16 self no 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10
setting: public high schools in Madrid and the surrounding area
MESSi (67) Demirhan 2019 Sakarya, Turkey 1,076 14–47 15 five-point Likert self yes 1,4,5,7,8,9,10
setting: high school and university students
MESSi (68) Weidenauer 2019 Tuebingen, Germany 215 11–17 15 five-point Likert self yes 1,6,8,9,10
setting: three different gymnasia (highest stratification level of school teaching) in SW Germany, Baden-Wuerttemberg
My Sleep and I (69) Rebelo-Pinto 2014 Lisbon, Portugal 654 10–15 27 five-point Likert self no 1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10
setting: schools in Portugal part of project Sleep More to Read Better
My children's sleep' (69) Rebelo-Pinto 2014 Lisbon, Portugal 612 21–68 27 five-point Likert parent no 1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10
setting: schools in Portugal part of project Sleep More to Read Better
NARQoL-21 (70) Chaplin 2017 Gothenburg, Sweden 158 8–13; 15–17 21 five-point Likert self no all steps
setting : patient and control group
NSD (71) Yoshihara 2011 Tochigi, Japan 40 6 months–6 years 2 parent diary yes 1,2,3,4,5,6
setting : take home diary
NSS (72) Ouyang 2019 Beijing, China n=53 pediatric n= 69 adult >8 years 15 no 1, 2, 7, 8, 9
setting : sleep lab
OSA Screening Questionnaire (73) Sanders 2015 Southampton, UK infancy to 6 years 33 parent over a week yes 1,2,3,4,5,6,9
setting : via a local Down syndrome parent support group
OSA-18 Questionnaire (74) Huang 2015 Hsinchu, Taiwan 163 6–12 18 seven-point ordinal parent past 4 weeks yes (English) 1,2,4,7,8,9,10
setting : via schools
OSA-18 Questionnaire (75) Kang 2014 Taipei, Taiwan 109 2–18 18 seven-point ordinal parent yes 1,2,4,6,8,9
setting : recruited from the respiratory, pediatric, psychiatric, and otolaryngologic clinics
OSA-18 Questionnaire (76) Bannink 2011 Rotterdam, Netherlands 119 patients; 162 (child);459 parent 2–18 18; OSA-12 in children, OSA-18 in parents seven-point ordinal parent/self yes 1,2,4,6,8,9
setting : patients with syndromic craniosynostosis; convenience sample of parents
OSA-18 Questionnaire (77) Mousailidis 2014 Athens, Greece 141 3–18 18 seven-point ordinal parent yes 1,2,4,6,8,9
setting : children who were referred for overnight polysomnography at the Sleep Disorders Laboratory
OSA-18 Questionnaire (78) Fernandes 2013 Guimarães, Portugal 51 2–12 18 seven-point ordinal parent past 4 weeks yes (English) 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : sleep clinic
OSA-18 Questionnaire (79) Chiner 2016 Alicante, Spain 60 2–14 18 seven-point ordinal parent 4 weeks yes 1,2,4,6,7,8,9
setting : children with suspected apnea-hypopnea syndrome were studied with polysomnography
OSA-5 Questionnaire (short) (80) Soh 2018 Melbourne, Australia 366 and 123 2–17.9 5 four-point Likert parent past 4 weeks yes all steps except 11
setting: Melbourne Children's Sleep Centre for polysomnography
OSD-6 QoL Questionnaire (81) Lachanas 2014 Larissa, Greece 91 3–15 6 seven-point ordinal parent yes (Greek and English) 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : children undergoing polysomnography
oSDB and AT (82) Links 2017 Baltimore, USA 32 39 three-point rating parent yes 1,2,4,6,8,9
setting : online Questionnaire
OSPQ (83) Biggs 2012 Adelaide, Australia 1,904 5–10 26 four-point Likert parent last typical school week no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10,11
setting : via 32 elementary schools in Adelaide
PADSS (84) Arnulf 2014 Paris, France 73; 98 >15 17 self no 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : patients with sleepwalking or sleep terror referred to the sleep disorder unit; controls
PDSS (85) Felden 2015 Curitiba, Brazil 90 10–17 8 five-point Likert self yes 1,2,4,5,8,9
setting : two private schools
PDSS (86) Komada 2016 Tokyo, Japan 492 11–16 8 self no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : one elementary school, one junior high school and one high school, located in suburbs of Japan
PDSS (87) Bektas 2015 Izmir, Turkey 522 5–11 8 four-point Likert self no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
setting : students were in grade 5-11
PDSS (88) Ferrari Junior 2018 Florianópolis, SC, Brazil 773 14–19 8 five-point Likert self no 1,7,8,9,10
setting : state schools of Paranaguá, Paraná
PDSS (89) Randler 2019 Petrozavodsk, Russia n1= 285
n2= 267
n3= 204
7–12 8 five-point Likert self yes 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
setting : Schools from six different settlements located in North-Western Russia (Murmansk region) participated in the study during our framework project "Sleep Health in Russian Arctic"
Pediatric Sleep CGIs (90) Malow 2016 Nashville, USA 20 5.3 14 seven-point rating parent yes (link) 1,2,4,5,6,9
setting : participants in a 12-week randomized trial of iron supplementation in children with autism spectrum disorders
PedsQL (fatigue scale) (91) Al-Gamal 2017 Amman, Jordan 70 5–18 18 three- and five-point Likert self no 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : oncology outpatient clinic
PedsQL (fatigue scale) (92) Qimeng 2016 Guangzhou, China 125 2–4 18 five-point Likert parent no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : diagnosed to have acute leukemia for 1 month at the least
PedsQL(fatigue scale) (93) Nascimento 2014 São Paolo, Brazil 216; 42 children (8–12 years), 68 teenagers (13–18 years), and 106 caregivers (parents or guardians) 8–18 18 five-point Likert parent/self no 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10
setting : oncology inpatient and outpatient pediatric clinics
PISI (94) Byars 2017 Cincinnati, OH, USA 462 4–10 6 six-point Likert parent yes 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10
setting : behavioral sleep medicine evaluation clinic
PNSSS (95) Whiteside-Mansell 2017 Little Rock, Arkansas, USA 72 1 week to 28 weeks 14 four-point scale professional no 1,2,8
setting : a naturalistic study of participants enrolled in two home visitation support programs
PosaST (96) Pires 2018 Porte Alegre, Brazil 60 3–9 6 five-point rating self yes 1,2,4,5,8,9
setting : children undergoing polysomnography
PPPS (97) Finimundi 2012 Porto Alegre, Brasil 144 10–17 mixed five-point rating self no 1,2,9
setting : adolescent students attending elementary school in two public schools in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (municipalities of Esteio and Farroupilha – great Porto Alegre, and Serra Gaúcha
P-RLS-SS (98) Arbuckle 2010 Cheshire, United Kingdom cognitive debriefing interviews with 21 of the same children/adolescents and 15 of their parents 6–17 26 morning and 28 evening items Wong and Baker pain faces scale parent/self no 1,2,4,5,6
setting : four pediatric sleep disorders specialists
PROMIS (99) van Kooten 2016 Amsterdam, Netherlands 6 experts, 24 adolescents and 7 parents 12–18 27 (PROMIS-SD), 16 (PROMIS-SRI) through Computerized AdaPOINTive Testing self/parent/expert no 1,2,9
setting : distributed to the adolescents in the classroom
PROMIS (100) van Kooten 2018 Amsterdam, Netherlands 1,046 11–19 27 (PROMIS- Sleep Disturbance), 16 (PROMIS- Sleep-Related Impairment) Self no 1,2,6,7,9,10
setting : online; schools from all educational levels and from different regions of the Netherlands
PROMIS (101) Forrest 2018 Philadelphia, PA, USA 1,104 children (8–17 years old) and 1,477 parents of children 5–17 years old 5–17 43; the final item banks included 15 items for Sleep Disturbance and 13 for Sleep-Related Impairment frequency-based (1: never, 2: almost never, 3: sometimes, 4: almost always, 5: always) self/parent 7-day yes 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : a convenience sample of children and parents recruited from a pediatric sleep clinic
PROMIS (102) Bevans 2019 Philadelphia, PA, USA 8 expert sleep clinician-researchers, 64 children ages 8–17 years, and 54 parents of children ages 5–17 years children ages 8–17 and parents of children ages 5–17. The final item pool contains 43 child-report items and 49 parent-report items five-point Likert Self/Parent In the past 7 days yes 1,2,3,4,5,6,9
setting : A preliminary child sleep health conceptual framework was generated based on the two PROMIS Adult Sleep Health item banks. Thereafter, the framework was refined based on expert and child and parent interviews
PSIS (103) Smith 2014 Texas, USA 155 3–5 12 five-point Likert parent no 1,2,6,8,9
setting : identified using a commercial mailing list and print advertisements distributed throughout local schools, daycares, community centers, and health care providers
PSQ (104) Ishman 2016 Ohio, USA 45 16.7 22 yes/no/don't know parent no 1,2,6,8
setting : teen-longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery (Teen-LABS) participants at high-risk for obstructive sleep apnea
PSQ (105) Yüksel 2011 Manisa, Turkey 111 2–18 22 yes/no and I don't know parent no 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : pediatric allergy and pulmonology outpatient department
PSQ (106) Bertran 2015 Santiago, Chile 83 0–15 22 yes/no/don't know parent no 1,2,6,7
setting: habitually snoring children referred for polysomnography
PSQ (107) Hasniah 2012 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 192;554 6–10 22 "yes=1," "No=0," and "Don't know=Missing" parent no 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : part of the national epidemiological study of the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in Malaysian school children
PSQ (108) Chan 2012 Hong Kong, China 102 2–18 22 yes/no/don't know parent no 1,2,9,11
setting : underwent overnight sleep polysomnography studies for suspected OSA in the sleep laboratory
PSQ (109) Ehsan 2017 Cincinatti, USA 160 2–18 22 yes/no/don't know parent no 1,2,6,9
setting : using an existing clinical database encompassing all children referred to the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Sleep Center for polysomnography
PSQ (110) Li 2018 Beijing, China 9,198 3.0–14.4 22 yes/no/don't know parent no 1,2,6,7,8,9
setting : 11 kindergartens, 7 primary schools and 8 middle schools from 7 districts of Beijing, China
PSQ (111) Longlalerng 2018 Chiang Mai, Thailand 62 7–18 22 yes/no/don't know parent no 1,2,4,5,8,9
setting : clinic based retrieval classified as overweight or obese according to the International Obesity Task Force and diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea
PSQ (112) Raman 2016 Ohio, USA 636 4–25.5 36 parent yes 1,2,4
setting : patients scheduled for a sleep study
PSQ (113) Certal 2015 Porto, Portugal 180 4–12 22 yes/no self yes 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : via schools north Portugal
PSQ (114) Jordan 2019 Paris, France 201 2–17 22 "yes," "no" or "don't know," parent yes 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
setting : admitted to the Odontology Center of the Rothschild Hospital (Assistance Publique e Hopitaux de Paris)
PSQI (115) Passos 2017 Pernambuco, Brazil 309 10–19 19 0–3 rating self no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
setting : subjects who engaged in amateur sports practice
PSQI (116) Raniti 2018 Melbourne, Australia 889 12.08–18.92 18 four-point Likert scale self 1 month no 1,7,8,9,10
setting : 14 Australian secondary schools
RLS (117) Schomöller 2019 Potsdam, Germany 33 (11 RLS) 6–12 and 13–18 12 mixed self/parent yes 1,2,3,4,6,8,9
setting : with the support of medical somnologists, who recruited pediatric patients from their practice or sleep laboratories, newsletter announcements in the Restless Legs Association journal, and via local selfhelp groups.
SDIS (118) Graef 2019 Cincinnati, Ohio 392 2.5–18.99 SDIS-C, 41 items, 2.5–10 years; SDIS-A, 46 items, 11–18 years seven-point Likert scale parent no 1,9
setting : Youth with insomnia, of whom 392 underwent clinically indicated diagnostic PSG within ± 6 months of SDIS screening
SDPC (119) Daniel 2016 Philadelphia, USA 20;6 3–12 41 0–4 rating parent Interview modelling no 1,2,4,6,9
setting : parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and medical providers
SDSC (120) Huang 2014 Guangzhou, China 3,525 5–16 26 five-point scale parent six months no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11
setting : selected from five primary schools in Shenyang
SDSC (121) Putois 2017 Sierre, Switzerland 447 4–16 25 five-point scale parent six months yes 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11
setting: schools; pediatric sleep clinic
SDSC (122) Saffari 2014 Isfahan, Iran 100 6–15 26 five-point scale parent six months no 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting: primary and secondary schools in Isfahan City, Iran
SDSC (14) Esbensen 2017 Cincinnati, OH, USA 30 6–17 26 five-point scale parent 6 months no 1,2,6,8,9
setting: part of a larger community-based study down syndrome sample
SDSC (123) Cordts 2019 Portland, OR, USA 69 3–17 26 five-point Likert parent 6 months no 1,6,8,9
setting: longitudinal pediatric neurocritical care programs at two tertiary academic medical centers within 3 months of hospital discharge
SDSC (124) Mancini 2019 Western Australia, Australia 307 4–17 26 five-point Likert parent 6 months no 1,2,10
setting: recruited via the Complex Attention and Hyperactivity Disorders Service (CAHDS), in Perth, Western Australia
SDSC* (125) Moo-Estrella 2018 Yucatán, Mexico 838 8–13 25 number of days : 0 = 0 days, 1 = 1–2 days, 2 = 3–4 days, 3 = 5–6 days, and 4 = 7 days. self during the last week no 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
setting : between the third and sixth grades of elementary school, recruited by convenience sampling
SHI (126) Ozdemir 2015 Konya, Turkey 106 patients with major depression; 200 volunteers recruited from community sample 16–60 13 Always, Frequently, Sometimes, Rarely, Never self no 1,2,6,7,8,9,10
setting : university based retrieval
SHIP (127) Rabner 2017 Boston, USA 1,078 7–17 15 three-point Likert parent/self no 1,2,6,8,9
setting: parents and children each completed questionnaires individually within 1 week prior to the child's multidisciplinary headache clinic evaluation
Sleep Bruxism (128) Restrepo 2017 Medellın, Colombia 37 8–12 1 yes/no parent 5-day diary yes (English) 1,2,4
setting : recruited from the clinics at Universidad CES
SNAKE (129) Blankenburg 2013 Datteln, Germany 224 <10 54 1–4 rating (mixed) parent yes (English) all steps
setting : children with severe psychomotor impairment; questionnaire-based, multicenter, cross-sectional survey
SQI (5) Chung 2011 Hong Kong, China 12–19 8 three-point Likert self In past 3 months no 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
setting: three schools with different levels of academic achievement
SQ–SP (130) Maas 2011 Maastricht, Netherlands 345 1–66 45 seven-point Likert parent last three months yes 1,2,6,7,8,9,10,
setting: individuals who consulted the sleep clinic for individuals with ID; individuals from a control group who attended a special day care center, special school or adult activity center for individuals with ID; participants of two published studies Maas et al., 2008, 2009); individuals who consulted a psychiatric clinic for children and adolescents with ID
SQS-SVQ (131) Önder 2016 Sakarya, Turkey 1,198 11–15 15* self yes 1,2,4,7,8,9,10
setting: an instrument adaptation study with different groups
SRSQ (132) van Maanen 2014 AmsterdamNetherlands 951;166;236;144;66 14.7 (mean) 9 three-point ordinal self previous 2 weeks no 1,2,6,8,9
setting : various samples from the general and clinical populations; online and paper and pencil
SSR (133) Orgilés 2013 Alicante, Spain 1,228 8–12 26 three-point self yes 1,2,4,6,7,8,9,10
setting : 9 urban and suburban schools; per 20 in group
SSR (43) Loureiro 2013 Lisbon, Portugal 306 7–12 26 three-point self no 1,2,4,5,6,8,9
setting : community and clinical samples
SSSQ (134) Yamakita 2014 Koshu, Japan 58 9–12 Please note your bedtime and wake time on both weekdays and weekends self log no 1,2,8,9
setting : a typical elementary school in Koshu City
STBUR (135) Tait 2013 Michigan, USA 337 2–14 5 yes/no, and don't know parent yes 1,2,3,4,6,7
setting : parents of children scheduled for surgery
STQ (136) Tremaine 2010 Adelaide, Australia 65 11–16 18 time self no 1,2,9
setting : 3 different private (independent) schools in South Australia
The Children's Sleep Comic (137) Schwerdtle 2012 Landau, Germany 201 5–10 37 tick in applicable square self no (examples) 1,2,4,9
setting : three primary schools in Germany (group)
The Children's Sleep Comic (138) Schwerdtle 2015 Würzburg, Germany 176;393 5–11 20 tick in applicable square parent/self no (examples) 1,2,3,4,6,8,9,11
setting : three primary schools in Germany (group)
TuCASA (139) Leite 2015 São Paolo, Brazil 62 4–11 13 parent yes 1,2,4,8,9
setting : sleep-disordered breathing diagnosed by polysomnography and controls
YSIS (140) Liu 2019 Shandong Province, China 11,626 15.0 ±1.5 8 five-point Likert self past month yes 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11
setting : Shandong Adolescent Behavior and Health Cohort, five middle and three high schools in three counties of Shandong Province, China

Steps: 1: purpose; 2: research question; 3: response format; 4: generate items; 5: pilot; 6: item-analysis, nonresponse; 7: structure; 8 reliability; 9: validity; 10: confirmatory analyses; 11: standardize and develop norms