Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):213–220. doi: 10.34172/apb.2020.025

Table 2. Evaluation of oxidative damage potentials of CuO-NPs .

Cells Exposure concentration (µg/mL) GSH (µmol /g protein) MDA (µmol/g protein) 8-OHdG (µg/g protein) PC (µg/g protein)
HepG2 NC 53 ± 1.2 0.32 ± 0.05 1.1 ± 0.12 6.6 ± 0.57
5 38 ± 0.99* 0.41 ± 0.03 0.91 ± 0.22 6.1 ± 0.64
10 38 ± 1.1* 0.44 ± 0.01 0.97 ± 0.09 6.9 ± 0.52
15 40 ± 0.95* 0.43 ± 0.05 1.1 ± 0.11 6.4 ± 0.49
25 36 ± 1.4* 0.42 ± 0.03 1.1 ± 0.12 7.3 ± 0.62
Caco-2 NC 41 ± 1.3* 0.35 ± 0.02 0.96 ± 0.09 8.2 ± 0.35
5 30 ± 0.86* 0.36 ± 0.05 0.99 ± 0.08 8.4 ± 0.35
10 31 ± 0.63* 0.52 ± 0.04* 0.95 ± 0.15 8.1 ± 0.78
15 27 ± 0.73* 0.51 ± 0.02* 0.96 ± 0.07 7.6 ± 0.48
25 22 ± 0.57* 0.52 ± 0.04* 0.94 ± 0.09 8.4 ± 0.72

Note. The protein amount calculated for 4x104 cells in every assay. The results were expressed as ± SD. * P ≤ 0.05 was significance. NC refers to negative control (unexposed cells).