Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;2020:4749712. doi: 10.1155/2020/4749712

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Wound closure after treatment. (a) Regression representation of wounds area (mm2) ± SEM of the BFt, Fibrinase®, and FtEHJ groups on the days after lesion treatment (n = 5/group/day after lesion treatment). (b) Percentual contraction of the lesions on 1st, 7th, and 9th day. FtEHJ vs BFt and Fibrinase®, p < 0.01; #Fibrinase® vs BFt, p < 0.01. The difference between the experimental groups was detected by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Newman–Keuls posttest. Bft basis of the topical formulation; FtEHJ, topical formulation of the hydroalcoholic extract of J. decurrens Cham.