Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;123(4):1355–1368. doi: 10.1152/jn.00591.2019

Table 1.

A summary of the number of ICMS sites required to define the border and the number of protocols collected per animal

Number of Protocols
Number of ICMS Sites to Define Border
CFA-CFA
RFA-CFA
RFA-RFA
Rat ID Right Left Tstim Right Tstim Left Tstim Right Tstim Left Tstim Right Tstim Left
002 5 4 0 0 2 0 0 2
004 5 4 0 0 0 0 2 0
049 6 6 3 0 0 0 0 0
050 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 2
082 3 12 4 0 0 0 2 0
083 3 4 4 0 0 0 3 0
086 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 2
089 7 4 0 5 0 0 0 0
099 37 11 0 0 0 3 0 0
100 11 9 0 1 2 1 0 0
119 25 21 0 0 4 0 0 0
126 5 4 0 0 4 1 0 0
127 17 14 0 0 0 0 1 0

Number of intracortical microstimulation techniques (ICMS) sites report the number cortical that needed to be inspected with ICMS trains to define the border between caudal and rostral forelimb areas (CFA and RFA) in each hemisphere. Number of protocols report the number of protocols collected for each type of modulatory effect studied (i.e., CFA-CFA, RFA-CFA, and RFA-RFA) and in which hemisphere the test stimulus (Tstim) was located.