Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 29;21:152. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01820-x

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients in the trials included in the meta-analysis

Study Study design Dialysis modality No. of patients Male/female Age (mean ± SD, y) Follow-up (months) NOS score
Tien KJ [1] Cohort PD/HD 3346 1398/1948 NA 53.2 7
22,820 10,784/12036 NA
Szeto CC [11] Cohort CAPD 252 135/117 59 ± 13 45.4 ± 26.5 6
Yu XF [27] Cohort CAPD 145 60/85 62 ± 15 48 6
Wang IK [28] Cohort PD/HD 6177 2665/3512 51.0 49.44 ± 34.32 8
6177 2726/3451 51.2 52.36 ± 37.2 7
Wu PP [29] Cohort PD/HD 2228 1096/1132 60.29 ± 16.43 64.2 ± 47.04 7
8912 4384/4528 60.29 ± 16.43 73.68 ± 47.4
Dong J [30] Cohort PD 32 9/23 61 ± 12.5 32.4 (12.9–60.8) 6
580 256/324 55.2 ± 15.4
Chou CY [31] Cohort PD/HD 2548 916/1632 50.2 ± 14.7 70 7
10,192 3692/6500 50.3 ± 14.5
Cheng SC [32] Cohort CAPD 14 5/9 46.4 ± 12.0 39.9 ± 28.3 6
21 7/14 42.4 ± 9.4 60.5 ± 37.8
Song ZP [33] Cohort PD 42 NA 60.2 ± 2.3 NA 6
42 NA 60.2 ± 2.3
Yang G [34] Cohort PD 40 NA 58.4 ± 4.7 NA 6
42 NA 58.4 ± 4.7
Ye SH [35] Cohort PD 44 24/20 60.14 ± 2.69 NA 6
44 25/19 60.78 ± 2.98
Peng XY [36] Cohort CAPD 138 83/55 57 (46–71) NA 7
69 38/31 56 (42–71)
Xia P [37] Cohort CAPD/APD 442 228/214 58.4 ± 15.6 NA 6
92 53/39 56.7 ± 16.0 NA
Fei JY [38] Cohort CAPD 286 148/138 58 (13–85) 3–120 6
Li Y [39] Cohort PD 577 280/297 58.9 ± 15.5 NA 6

Abbreviation: SD standard deviation, PD Peritoneal dialysis, HD hemodialysis, CAPD continuous ambulatory PD, APD, automated PD