Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 29;20:193. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02608-x

Table 2.

Service use outcomes at 6-month follow-up by treatment condition

Outcome 6-month follow-up 12-month follow-up
MBCI (N = 25a) SAT (N = 24) MBCI (N = 24b) SAT (N = 24)
1) Re-hospitalisation (≥1 OBDc)
 - Yes 6 (24%) 5 (21%) 7 (29%) 11 (46%)
 - No 19 (76%) 19 (79%) 17 (71%) 13 (54%)
2) Mean survival time (days)
 - Mean (SE) 156 (8.9) 164 (8.0) 291 (23.8) 278 (23.1)
 - Range 41–180 58–180 41–360 58–360
 - 95% CI 139–174 148–179 244–337 233–323
3) Total number of OBDs
 - Mean (SD) 11 (26) 14 (36) 28 (66) 33 (63)
 - Range 0–83 0–117 0–244 0–212
 - 95% CI 0–22 0–28 0–56 7–60
4) Episodes of care with crisis/home treatment team (HTT)d
 - Yes 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 2 (8%) 4 (17%)
 - No 25 (100%) 22 (92%) 22 (92%) 20 (83%)
5) No. of contacts with CMHTe
 - Mean (SD) 14 (7) 13 (7)
 - Range 0–32 3–34
 - 95% CI 10–17 10–16
6) Reference to therapy goal, which was shared with team
 - Yes 21(88%)
 - No 3 (12%)
7) Relapse
 Exacerbation in psychotic symptoms + change in clinical management
  - Yes 6 (25%) 7 (29%) 9 (38%) 14 (58%)
  - No 18 (75%) 17 (71%) 15 (62%) 10 (42%)

aRe-admission data not available for 1 participant

bRe-admission data not available for 2 participants

cOBD Occupied bed day

dStand-alone episodes of care only (i.e. not overlapping with inpatient admissions)

eCMHT Community mental health team; no. of contacts excluding therapy appointments