Table 2.
QI | Measure levela | Typeb | QI set affiliationc | Face validityd | Interrater reliabilitye | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
interRAI 1st | Swiss RAI-HC | interRAI 2nd | interRAI 1st | Swiss RAI-HC | interRAI 2nd | Swiss RAI-HC | |||
ADL | O | I | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | ≥ 0.60 | ||
ADL decline | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
ADL improvement | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
IADL | O | I | ✓ | A | ≥ 0.60 | ||||
IADL decline | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
IADL improvement | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Rehabilitation potential and no therapies | P | P | ✓ | (✓) | C | A | N/A | ||
Decline independency | O | P | ✓ | A | N/A | ||||
Difficulties in communication | O | I | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | N/A | ||
Communication decline | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Communication improvement | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Bladder incontinence | O | I | ✓ | ✓ | C | D | ≥ 0.60 | ||
Bladder decline | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Bladder improvement | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Bowel incontinence | O | I | (✓) | D | ≥ 0.60 | ||||
Obstipation | O | I | (✓) | A | ≥ 0.60 | ||||
Skin ulcer | O | I | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | < 0.40 | ||
Mouth problems | O | P | ✓ | A | 0.40–0.59 | ||||
Cognitive function | O | I | ✓ | ✓ | C | D | 0.40–0.59 | ||
Cognitive decline | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Cognitive improvement | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Delirium | O | P | ✓ | (✓) | C | A | N/A | ||
Negative mood | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | < 0.40 | ||
Mood decline | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Mood improvement | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Negative mood without intervention | O | P | (✓) | A | < 0.40 | ||||
Social isolation with distress | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | B | 0.40–0.59 |
Does not go out but used to | O | P | ✓ | B | |||||
Continued caregiver distress | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | A | B | < 0.40 | ||
Falls | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | C | D | B | ≥ 0.60 |
Neglect or abuse | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | N/A | ||
Injuries | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | C | B | |||
Hospital, ED, emergent care | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | C | B | |||
Daily severe pain | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | B | 0.40–0.59 |
Inadequate pain control | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | B | < 0.40 |
Pain improvement | O | I | ✓ | B | |||||
Dehydration | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | 0.40–0.59 | ||
Weight loss | O | P | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | B | N/A |
Weight change (undesired) | O | I | (✓) | D | N/A | ||||
Weight change (unfavourable) | O | I | (✓) | D | N/A | ||||
Inadequate meals | O | P | ✓ | C | |||||
Difficulty in locomotion and no assistive device | O | P | ✓ | C | |||||
Impaired locomotion in home | O | I | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | ≥ 0.60 | ||
No medication review by MD | P | P | ✓ | ✓ | C | A | N/A | ||
Inconsistent drug intake | O | P | (✓) | A | N/A | ||||
Hearing | O | P | (✓) | A | < 0.40 | ||||
Eyesight | O | P | (✓) | D | N/A | ||||
No flu vaccination | P | P | ✓ | ✓ | C | B |
Abbreviations: ADL Activities of daily living, ED Emergency department, IADL Instrumental activities of daily living, MD Medical doctor, QI Quality indicator, RAI-HC Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care
a O = Outcome, P = Process, classified by authors
b I = Incidence-based measure (measures changes in a client’s health status from one time point to another), P = Prevalence-based measure (measures client's health status at a single point in time)
c interRAI 1st = interRAI's 1st generation QI set by Hirdes et al. [37], Swiss RAI-HC = Swiss RAI-HC QI set by Burla et al. [29], interRAI 2nd = interRAI's 2nd generation QI set by Morris et al. [30], ✓ = part of the QI set, (✓) = part of the QI set but not core set (only for Swiss QIs)
d Face validity was assessed for all three QI sets:
A = Face validity assessed with nominal group technique and rated as appropriate
B = Face validity assessed with unstructured consensus process (approved by 70% of experts) and rated as appropriate
C = Rating process of face validity not described but rated as appropriate
D = Face validity assessed with nominal group technique and rated as inappropriate
e Interrater reliability was tested by Burla et al. [29] for 18 Swiss RAI-HC QIs, values indicate kappa/yules values, N/A = not applicable: interrater reliability not tested due to small sample size. Kappa/yules values < 0.40 were interpreted as insufficient reliability