Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 29;20:141. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01220-z

Table 3.

Comparison of eIF3m expression between different subtypes of breast cancer and breast

Author Subtypes (sample) P-value Fold change
Curtis IBC vs. Breast (21 vs. 144) 4.30E − 6 1.801
BPT vs. Breast (5 vs. 144) 0.008 1.828
TBC vs. Breast (67 vs. 144) 7.17E − 14 1.922
IDLBC vs. Breast (90 vs. 144) 2.87E − 12 1.844
IDBC vs. Breast (1556 vs. 144) 7.49E − 16 1.442
BC vs. Breast (14 vs. 144) 0.024 1.284
MBC1 vs. Breast (46 vs. 144) 6.08E − 8 1.635
DBCS vs. Breast (10 vs. 144) 0.005 1.412
MBC2 vs. Breast (32 vs. 144) 3.24E − 4 1.593
ILBC vs. Breast (148 vs. 144) 4.64E − 7 1.338
BBN vs. Breast (3 vs. 144) 0.057 1.437
Sorlie DBC vs. Breast (92 vs. 4) 0.037 1.169
Ma IDBC vs. Breast (9 vs. 14) 0.016 1.102
Richardson DBC vs. Breast (40 vs. 7) 0.002 1.182
TCGA IDBC vs. Breast (639 vs. 111) 9.24E − 5 1.030

IBC invasive breast carcinoma, BPT breast phyllodes tumor, TBC tubular breast carcinoma, IDLBC mixed invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinoma, IDBC invasive ductal breast carcinoma, BC breast carcinoma, MBC1 mucinous breast carcinoma, DBCS ductal breast carcinoma in situ; MBC2 medullary breast carcinoma, ILBC invasive lobular breast carcinoma, BBN benign breast neoplasm, DBC ductal breast carcinoma