Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Jun 12;47(4):499–526. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1466307

TABLE 4.

Level of Support Designations for Adolescent Substance Use Treatment Approaches, with Supporting Citations

Weil-Established Stand-Alone Treatments
CBT-G 2014 EBU
Burrow-Sánchez et al. (2015): culturally tailored CBT-G equivalent to standard CBT-G
CBT-I
FBT-E
Well-Established Multicomponent Treatments
MET/CBT 2014 EBU
Kelly et al. (2017): Equivalent to DC/12 but no SU effects
MET/CBT + FBT-B 2014 EBU
Probably Efficacious Stand-Alone Treatments
FBT-B 2014 EBU
MI/MET 2014 EBU
de Gee et al. (2014): Equivalent to information only Walker et al. (2016) (MET): MET boosters superior to MET only
Winters et al. (2014) (MI + Parent session): Superior to assessment only; Equivalent to MI only
Probably Efficacious Multicomponent Treatments
FBT-E + CM 2014 EBU
Letourneau et al. (2017): Equivalent to UC
MET/CBT + FBT-B + CM 2014 EBU
MET/CBT + CM Stanger et al. (2015): Superior to MET/CBT
Possibly Efficacious Stand-Alone Treatments
DC/12 2014 EBU
Kelly et al. (2017): Equivalent to MET/CBT but no
SU effects

Note: A-CRA = adolescent community reinforcement approach; BSFT = brief strategic family therapy; CBT = cognitive-behavioral therapy; CBT-G = group cognitive-behavioral therapy; CBT-I = individual cognitive-behavioral therapy; CM = contingency management; DC/12 = drug counseling/12-step approach; EBU = evidence base update; FBT-B = behavioral family-based treatment; FBT-E = ecological family-based treatment; MDFT = multidimensional family therapy; MET = motivational enhancement therapy; MI = motivational interviewing; SU = substance use; UC = usual care.

A 2014 EBU reference maintains designations from previous review (Hogue et al., 2014). Please consult that review for references supporting specific designations.