Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 10;23(4):353–359. doi: 10.1017/S2045796013000401

Table 1.

Performance on the CPA Crisis Plan Assessment Tool (n = 424)

Baseline
Yes (%)
1. Care plan has been reviewed in last 12 months 71
2. Care plan has been signed by the user 12.5
3. Service users are given a copy of their care plan 40.5
4. Service users are present (or decline to attend) at all meetings where care plans are agreed 52.4
5. Care planning includes relatives/ carers/ neighbours/ friends and agencies who have a role in supporting the service user 20.3
6. Care planning includes contingency arrangements for short notice failure in an element of support with the plan 30.4
7. Out of hours arrangements are specified 55
8. Crisis Plan includes:
8.1. Person who the service user is most responsive to 10
8.2. How to contact that person 2
8.3. Previous strategies that have been successful. 9.6
8.4. Previous strategies that have NOT been successful 2.1
8.5. Any treatment preferences or things they do want 4.5
8.6. Any treatment refusals or things they do NOT want 2.4
9. Relapse indicators
None identified 30.9
1 relapse indicator clearly identified 5.9
2 or more relapse indicators clearly identified 63.2
10. Crisis Action Plan (excl relapse indicators)
No crisis plan 28.5
Crisis plan, but no specific information 56.6
Crisis plan including one item of specific information 8.5
Crisis plan including more than one item of specific information 6.1
Missing 0.2