Study:Pietrobon 2004. Outcome: mortality |
Confounding domains |
Measured variable(s) |
Is there evidence that controlling for this variable was unnecessary? |
Is the confounding domain measured validly and reliably? |
OPTIONAL Is failure to adjust for this variable expected to favour intervention or comparator |
Severity of PDH |
Not defined or reported. |
No |
No |
— |
Severity of HIV |
Authors reported 11/16 participants with histoplasmosis had CD4 count < 50 cells/μL |
No |
Yes |
— |
Comorbidities and comedications |
Authors reported none of participants were receiving ART. Study population was 16. Comorbidities mentioned but not systemically. |
No |
No |
— |
Cointerventions |
Is there evidence that controlling for this cointervention was unnecessary? |
Is presence of this cointervention likely to favour outcomes in the intervention or comparator? |
ART at time of PDH diagnosis |
No |
— |
Supportive therapy |
No |
— |
Bias domain |
Signalling questions |
Comments |
Risk of bias judgement |
Bias due to confounding |
1.1–1.8 |
No use of ART during treatment period. Comorbidities mentioned but unclear whether all relevant comorbidities studied. Severity of PDH not reported. No report of statistical methods to control for confounders. ≥ 1 known important domain was not appropriately measured or controlled for. |
Serious |
Bias in participant selection |
2.1–2.5 |
Drug treatment for the initial phase provided for all participants – all received AmB. Time to commencement of treatment not reported. Data reported were retrospective analyses of medical records of patients with HIV and opportunistic infections. |
No information |
Bias in classification of intervention |
3.1–3.3 |
Intervention for management of acute phase was well defined. |
Low |
Bias due to deviations from intended intervention |
4.1–4.6 |
Deviations not reported. |
No information |
Bias due to missing data |
5.1–5.5 |
Data were reasonably complete. |
Low |
Bias in measurement of outcomes |
6.1–6.4 |
Measurement of mortality outcome unlikely to be influenced by knowledge of intervention received. |
Low |
Bias in selection of reported result |
7.1–7.3 |
Descriptive retrospective study. No protocol; however, there was no indication of selection of the cohort for analysis and reporting on the basis of the result. |
Moderate |
Overall bias |
Serious |