Table 5. Results for CANCRS, CPS and RbtGS compared to PP.
| PRESUMPTIVE PAIN (PP) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP | D | MP | SP | ||
| CANCRS | NP | 24 of 38 | 55 of 116 | 6 of 64 | 1 of 14 |
| D | 14 of 38 | 58 of 116 | 54 of 64 | 9 of 14 | |
| MP | 0 of 38 | 3 of 116 | 4 of 64 | 4 of 14 | |
| SP | 0 of 38 | 0 of 116 | 0 of 64 | 0 of 14 | |
| CPS | NP | 10 of 38 | 25 of 116 | 6 of 64 | 4 of 14 |
| D | 28 of 38 | 88 of 116 | 53 of 64 | 8 of 14 | |
| MP | 0 of 38 | 3 of 116 | 5 of 64 | 2 of 14 | |
| SP | 0 of 38 | 0 of 116 | 0 of 64 | 0 of 14 | |
| RbtGS | NP | 23 of 38 | 47 of 116 | 8 of 64 | 0 of 14 |
| D | 15 of 38 | 49 of 116 | 35 of 64 | 5 of 14 | |
| MP | 0 of 38 | 3 of 116 | 1 of 64 | 3 of 14 | |
| SP | 0 of 38 | 17 of 116 | 20 of 64 | 6 of 14 | |
A presumptive pain class (PP) was assigned to each patient at admission. Patients (n = 38) were classified as NP; patients (n = 116) were classified as D; patients (n = 64) were classified as MP; patients (n = 14) were classified as SP. Patients pain was then assessed. Results for CANCRS, CPS, RbtGS were divided for each pain class and listed in columns.