. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232278

Table 4. Growth performances of juvenile barramundi at different inclusion levels and types of PM.

	Inclusion levels (%)			Types of processed peanut meal				Two-way ANOVA
	15	30	60	FPM	GPM	UPM	Control	Inclusion levels	PM types	Interaction
FBW (g)	31.00^a±0.57	29.60^a±0.55	28.30^b±0.44	29.60^a ±0.49	29.50^a ±0.55	29.80^a ±0.83	30.60^a ±0.51	*	ns	ns
SGR (%/day)	2.87^a ±0.74	2.76^a±0.42	2.71^b±0.54	2.73^a±0.42	2.79^a±0.62	2.72^a±0.78	2.91^a±0.46	*	ns	ns
FCR	1.03±0.04	0.95±0.03	1.14±0.08	1.00±0.02	1.44±0.09	0.99±0.03	0.96±0.04	ns	ns	ns
Survival (%)	94.70^a±1.59	95.90^a±1.82	86.60^b±2.05	89.20^a ±1.91	94.50^a ±1.76	93.50^a ±2.77	91.40^a±2.47	*	ns	ns

Within rows, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Bonferroni test). Two-way ANOVA being set significance at P<0.05). FBW, final body weight; SGR, specific growth rate; FCR, feed conversion ratio; UPM, untreated peanut meal, FPM, fermented peanut meal; GPM, germinated peanut meal.