Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;48(8):e46. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa120

Table 1.

General guidelines for WSH scores

Score Concept Strengths Drawbacks Application scenario
PDR Locally disordered methylation Detects DNAm erosion; CpG-wise score; Fast computation Simulated heterogeneity not detected; Dependency on read length and CpG density Addressing locally disordered DNA methylation in large cancer datasets
MHL Methylation haplotypes CpG-wise score; Robust to technical setup Simulated heterogeneity not detected; Slow computation Linking genetically detected haplotypes to DNA methylation haplotypes
Epipoly Variance among the reads Simulated heterogeneity detected; Robust to technical setup no CpG-wise score; Few regions captured Segmentation into highly and lowly variably methylated regions for large bisulfite sequencing datasets
Entropy Variance among the reads Simulated heterogeneity detected; Robust to technical setup no CpG-wise score; Few regions captured Segmentation into highly and lowly variably methylated regions for large bisulfite sequencing datasets
FDRP Variance among the reads Simulated heterogeneity detected CpG-wise score Dependency on coverage, read length and CpG density; Rather slow computation Linking CpG-wise methylation values to epigenetic heterogeneity in large bisulfite sequencing datasets
qFDRP Variance among the reads Simulated heterogeneity detected; Robust to technical setup; CpG-wise score Rather slow computation Linking CpG-wise methylation values to epigenetic heterogeneity in large bisulfite sequencing datasets