Table 4:
Best fitting nuclear twin family design parameter estimates
| Informant | Model | A | S | F | E | Passive rGE | Assortative Mating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teacher | ASFE |
0.770* [0.619, 0.899] |
0.422* [0.248, 0.543] |
−0.120 [−0.280, −0.111] |
0.589* [0.536, 0.643] |
−0.139 [−0.215, −0.069] |
0.075* [0.004, 0.146] |
| Mother | ASFE |
0.601* [0.505, 0.687] |
0.563* [0.502, 0.602] |
0.081* [0.022, 0.142] |
0.471* [0.440, 0.505] |
0.061* [0.018, 0.100] |
0.093* [0.023, 0.164] |
| Father | ASFE | .144 [−0.360, 0.360] |
.717* [.653, 736] |
.279* [.201, 325] |
.531* [.494, 560] |
0.062 [−0.118, 0.109] |
0.073* [0.003, 0.142] |
Note: Additive genetic, dominant genetic, sibling environmental, familial environmental, and non-shared environmental influences are represented with A, D, S, F, and E, respectively. 95% confidence intervals are presented below the point estimate in brackets.
*
p < 0.05.