Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;23(2):205–217. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e22

Table 5. Relationship between physiological and subjective fatigue.

I (M1) I (M2) I (M4) T (M1) T (M2) T (M4) F (M1) F (M2) F (M3)
I (M1) -
I (M2) 0.819*
I (M4) 0.912* 0.921*
T (M1) 0.818* 0.733* 0.852*
T (M2) 0.658* 0.924* 0.835* 0.797*
T (M4) 0.952* 0.954* 0.866* 0.988* 0.992*
F (M1) −0.114 0.024 0.202 0.188 0.196 0.284
F (M2) −0.350 −0.274 −0.162 −0.206 −0.189 −0.164 0.575*
F (M3) −0.268 −0.223 0.122 −0.077 −0.100 −0.043 0.553* 0.694*
F (M4) −0.062 −0.021 0.215 0.257 0.242 0.295 0.498* 0.566* 0.444*

F = Korean version of revised Piper Fatigue Scale; I = interleukin-6; M1 = baseline; M2 = post-intervention; M3 = after 1 month; M4 = after 6 months; T = tumor necrosis factor-α.

*p < 0.001.