Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 13;16(1):60–66. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2020.16.e7

TABLE 2. Clinical and radiologic characteristics of the seven study patients.

Case Sex Age (years) Diagnosis Level OPLL thickness at the most severe site (mm) Operation modality Preoperative JOA score Postoperative JOA score Preoperative C2–C7 lordotic angle
1 M 56 OPLL C2–C4 3.8 Undercutting C2 10 3 3
2 M 64 OPLL C2–C7 5.4 Undercutting C2 11 4 13
3 M 51 OPLL C2–C6 6.2 Undercutting C2 10 3 14
4 M 51 OPLL C2–C7 7.3 Undercutting C2 11 2 8
5 F 58 OPLL C2–C4 5.6 Undercutting C2 11 3 18
6 M 58 OPLL C2–C6 6.1 Undercutting C2 10 3 16
7 M 73 OPLL C2–C5 5.9 Undercutting C2 10 3 12

OPLL: ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, JOA: Japanese Orthopedic Association.