Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):342–352. doi: 10.5551/jat.50633

Table 1. Characteristics of all the study participants.

Variable Total participants
(n = 7,750)
Age (years) 45.3 ± 8.1
Male gender, n (%) 7135 (92.1)
Current smoking, n (%) 3035 (39.2)
Systolic BP (mmHg) 118 ± 14
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 75 ± 9
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.80 ± 0.13
HDL-C (mg/dL) 60 ± 16
LDL-C (mg/dL) 119 ± 28
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 114 ± 75
FBG (mg/dL) 94 ± 13
HbA1c (%) 5.6 ± 0.5
Obesity-related indices
    Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.8 ± 3.0
    Percent body fat (%) 21.6 ± 5.3
    Waist circumference (cm) 81.5 ± 8.2
    Visceral fat area (cm2) 59.7 ± 37.3
Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome
    Based on abdominal obesity, n (%) 411 (5.3)
    Based on visceral fat accumulation, n (%) 277 (3.6)
Examination for subclinical atherosclerosis
    CAVI 7.3 ± 0.8
    Carotid IMT (mm) 0.55 ± 0.11

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or as n (%).

BP, blood pressure; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; CAVI, cardio-ankle vascular index; IMT, intima-media thickness.

Metabolic syndrome based on abdominal obesity was diagnosed by a waist circumference ≥ 85 cm for men and ≥ 90 cm for women. Metabolic syndrome based on visceral fat accumulation was diagnosed by a visceral fat area ≥ 100 cm2 using computed tomography.