Table 2.
Association between Internet Addiction (CIAS) and Sociodemographic Variables Based on Multiple Logistic Regression Model
Parameters | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
Sex | ||||||||
Girl | 1.30 (0.93,1.80) | 0.113 | 1.44 ( 1.02,2.04) |
0.038 | 1.45 (1.02,2.05) | 0.037 | 1.43 (1.004,2.04) |
0.047 |
Boy(ref.) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
Age(years) | ||||||||
12-14 | 0.80 (0.58,1.12) | 0.201 | 0.83 (0.58,1.18) |
0.304 | 0.83 (0.58,1.18) | 0.300 | 0.82 (0.57,1.17) | 0.276 |
15-18(ref.) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
Mother
Education |
||||||||
Under Diploma |
1.04 (0.57,1.86) |
0.902 | 1.04 (0.58,1.87) | 0.888 | 1.10 (0.60,1.99) | 0.754 | ||
Diploma | 0.86 (0.55,1.36) |
0.532 | 0.86 (0.55,1.36) | 0.545 | 0.85 (0.54,1.36) | 0.514 | ||
College Education (ref.) |
1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
Father
Education |
||||||||
Under high school diploma |
1.73 (0.99,3.01) |
0.052 | 1.79 (1.02,3.12) | 0.040 | 1.78 (1.01,3.13) | 0.044 | ||
Diploma | 1.29 (0.82,2.04) |
0.264 | 1.32 (0.84,2.10) | 0.223 | 1.30 (0.819,2.07) | 0.263 | ||
College Education (ref.) |
1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
Consulting
service |
||||||||
Yes | 1.26 (0.86,1.86) | 0.228 | 1.30 (0.88,1.93) | 0.179 | ||||
No(ref.) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Consanguin
eous marriage |
||||||||
No family relationship |
1.56 (1.03,2.37) | 0.035 | ||||||
family relationship(r ef.) |
1.00 | |||||||
AIC | 930.17 | 844.60 | 838.91 | 817.93 |
CIAS: Chen Internet Addiction Scale; AIC: Akaike's Information Criterion