Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;8:17. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-00294-4

Table 2.

Simple mediation models examining the hypothesized model and an alternative model in EDs without OBE (n = 439) and EDs with OBE (n = 560), using standardized variables and 99% CI:s using 10,000 bootstrap samples. All models adjusted for age and BMI

Group Path a Path b Total effect (c) Indirect effect (ab) 99% CI Direct effect (c´) Model R2
Hypothesized direction (DERS Total - > SASB Affiliation - > EDE-Q Global)
 Non-OBE EDs −.718*** −.631*** .451*** .453 .351–.564 −.002 (n.s.) .414***
 OBE EDs −.654*** −.479*** .417*** .313 .221–.419 .104* .304***
Alternative direction (SASB Affiliation - > DERS Total - > EDE-Q Global)
 Non-OBE EDs −.709*** −.002 (n.s.) −.630*** .002 −.089–.095 −.631*** .414***
 OBE EDs −.652*** .104* −.547*** −.068 −.152–.013 −.479*** .304***

BMI body mass index, DERS Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, CI confidence interval, ED eating disorder; EDE-Q Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, OBE objective binge-eating episode, SASB Structural Analysis of Social Behavior

*p < .05; ***p < .001