Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Apr 24;13(8):1204–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.013

Table 4.

Studies of PD-L1 and PD-1 in Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma, Including Expression Patterns and Prognostic Implications

Source Thymoma, n Thymic Carcinoma, n PD-1 Antibody PD-L1 Antibody PD-1 Positivity Thymoma, n (%) PD-L1 Positivity Thymoma, n (%) PD-1 Positivity Thymic Carcinoma, n (%) PD-L1 Positivity Thymic Carcinoma, n (%) PD-L1 Prognostic of Survival PD-1 Prognostic of Survival
Brown et al., 200350 26 8 NA 29E.2A3
29E.5A9
NA 21 (81)a NA 7 (88) NA NA
Katsuya et al., 201531 101 38 NAT105 (Abcam, rabbit monoclonal antibody) E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology) NA 22 (23) 23 (62) 26 (70) No;
p = 0.408
No;
p = 0.836
Yokoyama et al., 201649 82 0 NA EPR1161 (Abcam, rabbit monoclonal antibody) NA 44 (53.7) NA NA No;
p = 0.957
NA
Yokoyama et al., 201625 0 25 NAT105 (Abcam, rabbit monoclonal antibody) EPR1161 (Abcam, rabbit monoclonal antibody) NA NA NA 20 (80) Yes; high PD-L1 associated with longer OS (p = 0.010) Yes; PD-1 associated with worse prognosis (HR = 1.496, p = 0.037)b
Katsuya et al., 201645 12 18 NAT105 (Abcam, rabbit monoclonal antibody) E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology) 4 (44)c 6 (67) 8 (47) 7 (41) Nod No
Padda et al., 201524 65 4 NA Sino Biological clone 15 (rabbit monoclonal antibody) NA 44 (68)e NA 3 (75) Yes; high PD-L1 expression associated with worse OSf NA
Marchevsky and Walts, 201746 38 8 MRQ22; Cell Marque Clone SP142; Spring BioScience 24 (63) 35 (92) 3 (37.5) 4 (50) NA NA
Weissferdt et al., 201748 74 26 EPR4877 (Abcam, rabbit monoclonal antibody) E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology) 46 (62) 47 (64) 6 (23) 14 (54) No; thymoma p = 0.4180 or thymic carcinoma p = 0.4628 No; p = 0.3942 or thymic carcinoma p = 0.2137
Tiseo et al., 201747 87 20 NA E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology) NA 15 (18) NA 13 (65) No; p = 0.604 No; p = 0.206
Present study 32 3 NAT105 (Abcam, rabbit monoclonal antibody) 22C3 (Dako North America) 26 (81) 26 (81) 1 (33) 3 (100) No; p = 0.119g NA; p = 0.469

Manufacturers noted are Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom), Cell Marque Corporation (Rocklin, California), Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, Massachusetts), Spring Bioscience (Pleasanton, California), and Dako North America (Carpinteria, California).

a

Eleven of 11 invasive (100%) thymoma samples and 10 of 15 (67.77%) noninvasive thymoma samples.

b

Lower PD-1 expression among tumor infiltrating lymphocytes was associated with poorer OS in patients with thymic carcinoma only.

c

For analysis in this study, evaluable tumor samples included 9 thymomas and 17 thymic carcinomas.

d

PD-L1 expression was not prognostic in either thymic carcinoma (p = 0.449) or thymoma (p = 0.624). PD-1 expression was not prognostic in either thymic carcinoma (p = 0.650) or thymoma (p = 0.689).

e

All thymic neoplastic and control samples stained positive for PD-L1; samples were analyzed according to PD-L1 high expression versus PD-L1 low expression.

f

In unadjusted analysis, no difference in OS was noted, but in age and gender adjusted analysis PD-L1high versus PD-L1 low had worse OS (p = 0.035), but included both thymoma and thymic carcinoma together. When adjusted for stage, no significant association with OS was noted (p = 0.071).

g

Reported for thymoma cohort, since no difference able to report since three thymic carcinoma patients had PD-L1 expression.

PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; PD-1, programmed death 1; NA, not available; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio.