Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;2020(5):CD011368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011368.pub2

Comparison 6. Topical salicylic acid versus no treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
6.1 Participants' global self‐assessment of acne improvement 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1.1 moderate to excellent improvement (long term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.2 Withdrawal for any reason 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.2.1 long term 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.3 Change in lesion counts ‐ total (percentage reduction from baseline) 3   Other data No numeric data
6.4 Change in lesion counts ‐ inflamed (percentage reduction from baseline) 2   Other data No numeric data
6.5 Change in lesion counts ‐ non‐inflamed (percentage reduction from baseline) 2   Other data No numeric data
6.6 Physicians' global evaluation of acne improvement 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.6.1 moderate to excellent improvement (long term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.7 Minor adverse events 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6.7.1 dryness 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.67 [1.25, 5.68]
6.7.2 peeling 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.50 [0.74, 3.03]
6.7.3 erythema 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.00 [0.94, 17.00]
6.7.4 burning 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.67 [0.71, 3.89]
6.7.5 itching 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.67 [0.45, 6.24]
6.7.6 total events (long term) 2 78 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.43 [0.14, 82.00]
6.8 Quality of life (QoL) ‐ AQOL (score, post‐intervention) 1   Other data No numeric data