Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;2020(5):CD011368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011368.pub2

Comparison 10. Topical sulphur versus no treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
10.1 Participants' global self‐assessment of acne improvement (numerical point system defined by investigator, high = well) 1   Other data No numeric data
10.1.1 medium term 1   Other data No numeric data
10.2 Withdrawal for any reason 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
10.2.1 medium term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
10.3 Change in lesion counts (scores, high = well) 1   Other data No numeric data
10.4 Physicians' global evaluation of acne improvement 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
10.4.1 moderate to good improvement (medium term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
10.5 Physicians' global evaluation of acne improvement (numerical point system defined by investigator, high=well) 1   Other data No numeric data
10.5.1 medium term 1   Other data No numeric data
10.6 Minor adverse events ‐ erythema and drying 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected