TABLE 3.
VitE | Chow | WD for 8 weeks | WD for 20 weeks | |||
(−) | (+) | (−) | (+) | (−) | (+) | |
16:0 | 18.54 ± 0.32 | 18.10 ± 0.26 | 19.58 ± 0.16a | 20.43 ± 0.25b | 20.71 ± 0.10a,c | 20.46 ± 0.09 |
16:1 | 0.70 ± 0.14 | 0.76 ± 0.03 | 1.55 ± 0.04a | 1.45 ± 0.05 | 1.92 ± 0.06a,c | 1.93 ± 0.06 |
18:0 | 20.25 ± 0.39 | 19.40 ± 0.30 | 15.51 ± 0.23a | 15.94 ± 0.21 | 15.29 ± 0.11a | 14.97 ± 0.22 |
18:1ω9 | 8.50 ± 0.27 | 9.13 ± 0.23 | 13.09 ± 0.19a | 13.18 ± 0.19 | 15.14 ± 0.16a,c | 14.75 ± 0.16 |
18:1ω7 | 2.98 ± 0.19 | 2.97 ± 0.12 | 5.51 ± 0.22a | 5.41 ± 0.15 | 6.49 ± 0.12a,c | 6.28 ± 0.15 |
18:2 | 11.39 ± 0.51 | 11.06 ± 0.29 | 7.61 ± 0.29a | 8.05 ± 0.17 | 7.03 ± 0.09a | 6.80 ± 0.14 |
20:3ω6 | 3.45 ± 0.19 | 3.65 ± 0.11 | 3.81 ± 0.10 | 4.00 ± 0.11 | 3.48 ± 0.06 | 3.47 ± 0.04 |
20:4 | 19.06 ± 0.53 | 17.29 ± 0.18b | 20.86 ± 0.37a | 20.07 ± 0.14 | 20.77 ± 0.26a | 21.02 ± 0.17 |
20:5 | 0.92 ± 0.22 | 1.26 ± 0.08 | 0.17 ± 0.07a | 0 ± 0b | 0 ± 0a | 0 ± 0 |
22:4ω6 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.54 ± 0.07a | 0.26 ± 0.08b | 0.26 ± 0.11 | 0.72 ± 0.02b |
22:5ω6 | 0 ± 0 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 1.37 ± 0.09a | 1.42 ± 0.11 | 0.52 ± 0.22c | 1.43 ± 0.03b |
22:5ω3 | 0.37 ± 0.12 | 0.75 ± 0.02b | 0 ± 0a | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0a | 0.05 ± 0.05 |
22:6 | 13.84 ± 0.29 | 15.43 ± 0.28b | 10.40 ± 0.21a | 9.79 ± 0.10b | 8.39 ± 0.23a,c | 8.11 ± 0.09 |
Data are expressed as mean (percent of lipid composition) ± SEM, n = 8–11 mice.
P < 0.05 versus chow.
P < 0.05 versus no VitE treatment, same diet.
P < 0.05 versus WD for 8 weeks.