TABLE 5.
VitE | Chow | WD for 8 weeks | WD for 20 weeks | |||
(−) | (+) | (−) | (+) | (−) | (+) | |
14:0 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.88 ± 0.21 | 1.22 ± 0.04a | 1.51 ± 0.13b | 1.08 ± 0.06 | 1.07 ± 0.05 |
16:0 | 35.84 ± 1.18 | 36.20 ± 1.77 | 39.34 ± 0.58a | 39.87 ± 0.79 | 35.06 ± 0.80c | 35.40 ± 0.95 |
16:1 | 3.56 ± 0.20 | 3.80 ± 0.16 | 4.98 ± 0.15a | 4.66 ± 0.23 | 5.08 ± 0.17a | 4.62 ± 0.16 |
18:0 | 5.53 ± 0.52 | 9.58 ± 0.90b | 5.03 ± 0.41 | 7.55 ± 1.02b | 5.10 ± 0.91 | 4.58 ± 0.26 |
18:1ω9 | 44.57 ± 1.63 | 40.02 ± 2.36 | 37.57 ± 0.67a | 35.38 ± 1.13 | 39.57 ± 1.09a | 42.67 ± 1.37 |
18:1ω7 | 5.35 ± 0.56 | 5.56 ± 0.13 | 10.57 ± 0.24a | 9.10 ± 0.81 | 12.65 ± 0.41a,c | 10.84 ± 0.27b |
18:2 | 4.28 ± 0.50 | 3.96 ± 0.40 | 1.28 ± 0.06a | 1.93 ± 0.60 | 1.08 ± 0.27a | 0.81 ± 0.10 |
Data are means (% of lipid composition) ± SEM, n = 8–11 mice.
P < 0.05 versus chow.
P < 0.05 versus no VitE treatment, same diet.
P < 0.05 versus WD for 8 weeks.