Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;15(5):e0232531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232531

Table 2. CIMT according to pesticide exposure.

Variables CIMT, N (%) p-value*
≥0.9 mm <0.9 mm
Farmer 0.003
    Never 12 (5.04) 226 (94.96)
    Yes 31 (12.97) 208 (87.03)
Pesticide use 0.002
    Never 16 (5.63) 268 (94.37)
    Yes 27 (13.99) 166 (86.01)
Years of pesticide use 0.210
    <1 23 (7.40) 288 (92.60)
    1–20 4 (10.00) 36 (90.00)
    ≥20 16 (12.70) 110 (87.30)
Frequency of pesticide use (per year) 0.056
    0 22 (6.98) 293 (93.02)
    1–10 4 (9.09) 40(90.91)
    ≥10 17 (14.41) 101 (85.59)
Intensity level of pesticide exposure 0.133
    None 20 (6.92) 269 (93.08)
    Lower exposure 13 (12.87) 88 (87.13)
    Higher exposure 10 (11.49) 77 (88.51)
CEI of pesticide use 0.006
    None 18 (6.19) 273 (93.81)
    Lower cumulative exposure 7 (10.14) 62 (89.86)
    Higher cumulative exposure 15 (17.24) 72 (82.76)

Abbreviations: CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; CEI, cumulative exposure index

Intensity level = (mixing status + application method + equipment repair status) × personal protective equipment

Cumulative exposure index = intensity level × spraying years × spraying days per year

*p-value from chi-square test