Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroimaging. 2020 Jan 29;30(2):212–218. doi: 10.1111/jon.12688

Table 3.

Modeling the ability of MRI to predict disability change over 5 years

All subjects (n=200) BWH (n=100) UCSF (n=100)
BPF −2.37 (−4.71, −0.02)
p=0.048*
3.30 (−4.03, 10.64)
p=0.37
−0.72 (−6.18, 7.63)
p=0.84
T2LV 0.16 (−0.10, 0.42)
p=0.23
0.38 (−0.23, 0.98)
p=0.22
0.17 (−0.12, 0.46)
p=0.25
Age −0.009 (−0.031, 0.012)
p=0.39
−0.011 (−0.044, 0.023)
p=0.53
0.009 (−0.024, 0.042)
p=0.60
Sex −0.19 (−0.59, 0.21)
p=0.35
−0.16 (−0.78, 0.46)
p=0.61
−0.11 (−0.62, 0.41)
p=0.67

Key: These estimates with 95% confidence intervals are unstandardized regression coefficients from a linear regression with 5-year change in Expanded Disability Status Scale score as the outcome and these four predictors in the model together. BWH = Brigham and Women’s Hospital; UCSF = University of California, San Francisco; BPF = brain parenchymal fraction; T2LV = global cerebral T2 hyperintense lesion volume (the cube root-transformed T2LV was used);

*

p<0.05.