Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroimaging. 2020 Jan 29;30(2):212–218. doi: 10.1111/jon.12688

Table 4.

Whole brain volume measurement at the UCSF site: comparison of two methods

BPF BPV
Disease duration −0.331 (−0.495, −0.144)
p=0.001**
−0.332 (−0.496, −0.145)
p=0.001**
EDSS at baseline −0.371 (−0.528, −0.188)
p<0.001***
−0.370 (−0.528, −0.187)
p<0.001***
EDSS at 5y −0.366 (−0.525, −0.183)
p<0.001***
−0.362 (−0.522, −0.178)
p<0.001***
EDSS 5y change −0.037 (−0.232, 0.160)
p=0.711
−0.033 (−0.228, 0.165)
p=0.745
T2LV −0.227 (−0.406, −0.032)
p=0.023*
−0.231 (−0.409, −0.037)
p=0.021*
Age −0.523 (−0.653, −0.364)
p<0.001***
−0.526 (−0.655, −0.367)
p<0.001***

Key: Pearson correlations between the clinical/demographic variable in the first column and whole brain volume, with 95% confidence intervals. UCSF = University of California, San Francisco; BPF = brain parenchymal fraction; BPV=normalized brain parenchymal volume; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale score; T2LV = global cerebral T2 hyperintense lesion volume (the cube root-transformed T2LV was used);

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001.