Table 3.
Summary of single-person and two-person literature review methodology
Protocol/methodology | Single-person review | Two-person systematic review |
---|---|---|
Development of research questions | Consultation with NIPC steering and consensus groups – sign-off by NCIC | Consultation with NIPC steering and consensus groups – sign-off by NCIC |
Performing searches | Lead reviewer only | Lead or supporting reviewer only |
Screening and selection of articles | Lead reviewer only | Lead and supporting reviewer independently select articles for inclusion and agree by discussion |
Evidence appraisal and grading | Lead reviewer only | Lead reviewer appraises all evidence and completes evidence tables, supporting reviewer completes a check of at least 30% of the appraisals and evidence tables |
Write-up of literature review | Lead reviewer only | Lead reviewer only |
Development of recommendations | Lead reviewer suggests recommendations for sign-off by the NCIC | Lead reviewer suggests recommendations, second author agrees the content before sign-off by the NCIC |
Consultation | 4–6 week consultation with NIPC steering and consensus groups plus any topic experts | 4–6 week consultation with NIPC steering and consensus groups plus any topic experts |
Maintaining and updating literature reviews and NIPCM | RSS feeds and monthly auto-alerts with any required changes to recommendations made in real-time. Quarterly evidence tables circulated to stakeholders and published online. | RSS feeds and monthly auto-alerts with any required changes to recommendations made in real-time. Quarterly evidence tables circulated to stakeholders and published online. |