Table 2.

MMAT quality appraisal results ^a

	1. Qualitative					4. Quantitative descriptive
	1.1	1.2	1.3	1.4	1.5	4.1	4.2	4.3	4.4	4.5
	Approach appropriate to the research question	Data collection methods adequate	Findings adequately derived from data	Interpretation of results substantiated by data	Coherence between the data source, collection, analysis, interpretation	Sampling strategy relevant to the research question	The sample representative of the population	Measurements appropriate	Risk of nonresponse bias low	Statistical analysis appropriate to the research question
Abbott, R. et al. (2008) [33]						✓	✓	✓	x	✓
Dockery A.M. & Gorman, S. (2017) [41]
Edwards, N. et al. (2005) [39]	✓	✓	✓	U	U
Evans, J. R, et al. (2018) [25]						✓	✓	✓	U	✓
Gwynn, J. et al. (2014) [34]	✓	U	U	U	U
MacDonald, D. et al. (2012) [36]	✓	✓	✓	✓	U
Meldrum et al. 2012 [37]	✓	x	✓	✓	U
Nelson, A. (2009) [38]	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
VIC DEECD (2009 [40])						✓	✓	✓	✓	✓

✓ Yes

x No

U Unclear/Unsur

^aThe Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool questions have been presented in the form of statements in Table 2