Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 9;9(2):279–291. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00242-0

Table 2.

Histologic results after control and modified valve implantation

n Mean fibrosis (μm) Mean difference (μm) Standard deviation (μm) Median fibrosis (μm) Range of values (μm) p value
Fibrosis with H&E stain
Control 30 104.0 76.5 87.2 25.2–370.5
 Hydrophilic coating 30 82.3 −21.7 35.9 74.9 30.3–195.9 0.077
 Heparin coating 30 57.6 −46.4 32.3 54.2 16.1–178.3 0.002
 Micro-patterned surface 29 71.4 −32.6 20.9 68.9 39.8–130.9 0.009
Total mean fibrosis = 78.9 (μm)
Fibrosis with trichrome stain
 Control 30 82.1 40.2 73.7 21.5–217.3
 Hydrophilic coating 30 85.1 3.0 46.7 79.0 18.6–211.4 0.807
 Heparin coating 30 31.4 −50.7 15.6 29.1 7.6–70.3 < 0.001
 Micro-patterned surface 30 53.2 −28.9 22.0 50.3 21.8–120.1 0.018
Total mean fibrosis = 62.9 (μm)
Fibrosis with α-smooth muscle actin
 Control 30 85.1 71.5 76.4 17.7–329.8
 Hydrophilic coating 30 85.1 0.0 44.3 75.9 28.3–240.0 0.998
 Heparin coating 30 58.9 −26.2 52.8 46.6 10.8–308.5 0.033
 Micro-patterned surface 30 66.5 −18.6 56.0 38.2 14.9–254.5 0.129
Total mean fibrosis = 73.9 (μm)
Net fibrosis by group
 Control 90 90.4 65.3 82.9 17.7–370.5
 Hydrophilic coating 90 84.2 −6.2 42.7 76.4 18.6–240.0 0.425
 Heparin coating 90 49.3 −41.1 38.9 42.0 7.56–308.5 0.006
 Micro-patterned surface 89 63.7 −26.7 37.9 56.0 14.9–254.5 0.003
Total mean fibrosis of all samples = 73.1 (μm)

One image was lost from the micro-patterned surface due to damaged tissue and therefore was excluded from analysis