Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 27;10(12):5613–5622. doi: 10.7150/thno.45985

Table 2.

Performance for predicting progression to severe illness with logistic regression analysis

Day 0 P Day 4 P Changes from Day 0 to Day 4 P
APACHE-II 0.78(0.69~0.88) 0.554 0.77(0.66~0.89) 0.076 0.82(0.72~0.91) 0.046
NLR 0.78(0.67~0.88) 0.636 0.84(0.75~0.93) 0.156 0.78(0.67~0.88) 0.001
D-dimer 0.75(0.64~0.85) 0.410 0.78(0.67~0.88) 0.007 0.78(0.67~0.88) 0.001
PGV 0.76(0.65~0.86) 0.753 0.83(0.73~0.93) 0.015 0.84(0.74~0.93) 0.015
PSV 0.76(0.65~0.86) 0.644 0.87(0.77~0.97) 0.256 0.92(0.86~0.99) 0.464
PCV 0.76(0.66~0.86) 0.738 0.88(0.79~0.97) 0.572 0.91(0.85~0.98) 0.190
CT features 0.76(0.66~0.86) Reference 0.89(0.80~0.97) Reference 0.93(0.87~0.99) Reference
NLR + CT features 0.78(0.67~0.88) 0.551 0.89(0.80~0.97) 0.432 0.93(0.87~0.99) 0.336

Note:

(a) Results are presented as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) along with 95% CI.

(b) PGV=Percentage of GGO volume; PSV=Percentage of semi-consolidation volume; PCV=Percentage of consolidation volume.

(c) All models were adjusted for traditional clinical variables including age and gender.