Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 7;10(12):5501–5513. doi: 10.7150/thno.45554

Table 2.

The performance of mcfDNA sequencing versus initial blood culture and other microbiological methods reported by previous studies.

ID Diseases Case/ Specimen(n) Pathogen detection rate Sensitivity % Specificity % Reference
Culture (%) Other methods (%) mcfDNA sequencing (%)
1 Spesis 78 12.8(10/78) - 30.8(24/78) 70(7/10) 88.2(60/68) 18
2 Spesis 348 18.1(63/348) 37.9(169/348) a 48.6(169/348) 92.9(169/182) 62.7(104/166) 4
3 Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) 15 6.7(1/15) 46.7(7/15) b 86.7(13/15) - - 42
4 Pediatric infections 100 23.0(23/100) 52.0(52/100) c 70.0(70/100) 91.8(56/61) 64.1(25/39) 102
5 iInvasive mycobacterium 10 50.0(5/10) - 90.0(9/10) - - 53
6 Patients with fever of unknown origin, suspected respiratory infection, sepsis, suspected endocarditis or febrile neutropenia 82 19.5(16/82) 32.9(27/82) d 61.0(50/82) - - 49
7 Pneumonia 18 - - 66.7(12/18) - - 57
8 Pelapsed pediatric cancer patients with impending bloodstream infection (BSI) 47 - - - 83(15/18) 82(27/33) 26

Note: Other methods are microbiological tests including: (a) cultures, serology and nucleic acid testing; (b) standard culture and PCR based methods; (c) culture, PCR, morphology, serological test, etc.; (d) blood culture, tissue bacterial culture, viral PCR, etc.