Skip to main content
. 2020 May 3;2020(5):CD012864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012864.pub2

Pinto 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Study location: USA
Inclusion criteria:
1. sedentary adults
2. stage 1‐3 colorectal cancer
3. finished treatment surgery and/or adjuvant therapy
4. less than 5 years postdiagnosis
5. English speaking
6. access to a telephone
7. CVD or diabetes with consent
Exclusion criteria:
1. prior history of cancer
2. medical or current psychiatric illness (e.g. orthopaedic problems) that could make compliance with the study protocol difficult or unsafe
Participants Number randomised: 46; 20 to physical activity group, 26 to control group
Baseline imbalances: more people in employment in the control group
Withdrawals and exclusions: 4 withdrew; 1 in physical activity group, 3 in control group
Age: 57.3 years (SD 9.7); intervention 55.6 (8.24) control 59.5 (11.2)
Gender: male and female (57%)
Ethnicity: majority white
Comorbidities: not reported
SES: majority attended college and had a median household income of USD 60,000
Cancer type: colorectal cancer; 57% colon cancer, 43% rectal cancer
Cancer stage: stage I‐III
Type of treatment: 100% surgery or surgery with adjuvant therapy 20/46 radiotherapy; 38/46 chemotherapy
Receiving or finished treatment: finished
Time beyond treatment: < 5 years since completion of treatment
Time since diagnosis: mean 2.99 years since diagnosis
Interventions Physical activity description:
Frequency: encouraged 10 minutes at least 2 days per week for three weeks, goals were increased over the 12 weeks to 30 minutes a day, 5 days per week
Intensity: moderate 64% to 76% estimated heart rate max
Type: e.g. brisk walking, biking, home‐based exercise equipment
Length of intervention: 12 weeks
Control group: contact control group (received weekly calls to match frequency of contact with physical activity group and survivorship tip sheets)
Setting: home based
Supervised or self‐directed: self‐directed
Co‐interventions: none
Outcomes 1. Levels of physical activity (7‐day recall, Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors, accelerometry),
2. Movement to action/maintenance stage of motivational
readiness,
3. Submaximal aerobic fitness (Treadwalk test)
4. Psychological outcomes (FACT‐C)
5. Fatigue (FACT‐F)
6. Anthropometric measurements (height, weight, BMI)
Time points measured: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Time points reported:
Adverse events: not reported
Notes Funding source: National Cancer Institute
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Not possible to blind participants and personnel
due to the nature of the intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Assessments conducted by a staff member who was blinded to the participants' group assignments
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Reasons for missing outcome data were described (9% attrition)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes reported are consistent with study protocol
Other bias High risk Due to baseline imbalances alongside unclear allocation concealment