Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;8(4):e1141. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1141

Table 2.

Electrophysiological testing results of CMT cases diagnosed by WES in Neurology Laboratory, University of Cretea

Nerve stimulated Recording site Stimulation site Patient #1 Patient #2 Patient #3
Distal latency (ms) Conduction velocity (m/s) Distal latency (ms) Conduction velocity (m/s) Distal latency (ms) Conduction velocity (m/s)
Tibial (m) L AH Ankle NR NR NR NR 8.0
Popliteal fossa 33
Tibial (m) R AH Ankle NR NR NR NR 8.8
Popliteal fossa 36
Median (m) L APB Wrist 6.1 4.8 4.7
Antecubital fossa 25.0 31.8 37
Ulnar (m) L ADM Wrist 4.4 3.5    
Below elbow 20.2 26.4 3.7
Above elbow 22.0 25.0 37
Median (m) R APB Wrist 8.3 4.4 4.6
Antecubital fossa 17.4 30.7 38
Ulnar (m) R ADM Wrist 6.0 2.5 5.0
Below elbow 21.8 25.0 33
Above elbow NR 23.8 NR
Median (s) L Wrist Index finger NR NR NR 41.2 NR NR
Ulnar (s) L Wrist Little finger NR NR NR 38.0 NR NR

Abnormal values are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: ADM, abductor digiti minimi; AH, abductor hallucis; APB, abductor pollicis brevis; CMT, Charcot–Marie–Tooth; NR, not recorded; WES, whole exome sequencing.

a

More extended neurophysiological testing results are shown in the supplementary material.