TABLE 5.
Barriers to implementation of IGRAs for LTBI screening in HBC NTPs according to survey respondents
Country | Barriers to IGRA implementation | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High cost | No budget allocated | Not clear if IGRAs better than PPD | IGRA kits not domestically available | Lack of laboratory infrastructure | Limited availability of laboratory personnel | Insufficient capacity for specimen transport | Other | ||
Currently using IGRAs | Cambodia | ||||||||
China | |||||||||
Nigeria | |||||||||
Tanzania | |||||||||
Thailand | |||||||||
Russia | |||||||||
Currently not using IGRAs |
Brazil | Awaiting approval for use of IGRAs (by National Committee for New Technologies Incorporation) | |||||||
Angola | |||||||||
Bangladesh | |||||||||
DRC | |||||||||
Ethiopia | NTP policy does not recommend use of IGRAs | ||||||||
India | Lack of country‐specific evidence for IGRA cut‐offs | ||||||||
Indonesia | Lack of policy on IGRA use | ||||||||
Kenya | Policy on IGRA use still in development | ||||||||
Lesotho | |||||||||
Liberia | |||||||||
Mozambique | |||||||||
Myanmar | |||||||||
Pakistan | NTP policy does not recommend use of IGRAs | ||||||||
Philippines | Requirement for blood draw | ||||||||
South Africa | |||||||||
Vietnam | Complexity of technique and lack of feasibility to apply at peripheral levels | ||||||||
Zambia | LTBI previously not prioritized | ||||||||
Zimbabwe |
Barrier experienced in NTP.
Unsure if barrier is experienced in NTP.
Abbreviations: HBCs, high‐burden countries; IGRAs, interferon‐gamma release assays; LTBI, latent TB infection; NTP, national TB program; PPD, purified protein derivative.