TABLE 1.
Correlation of the in silico analysis data with experimental data of cross-reactivity.
| MHC binding affinity |
Ranks (%) of being presented |
Experimental data |
|||||
| Epitope | Peptide Sq | NetMHC 4.0 |
IEDB |
NetCTLpan | [Peptide] (μg/ml) |
||
| Affinity (nM) | Rank (%) | Rank (%) | 1.0 | 0.01 | |||
| AFP158 | FMNKFIYEI | 3.2 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.01 | ++++ | ++++ |
| ENPP1436 | YLNKYLGDV | 28.67 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1 | +++ | + |
| RCL1215 | ILNKFIPDI | 64.06 | 0.8 | 2 | 0.8 | −/−/++ | −/−/+ |
| FL2D189 | LQKKYSEEL | 11170.64 | 17 | 22 | 6 | +/+/++ | −/−/− |
| EPG51033 | SIEKFCAEG | 20847.93 | 29 | 37 | 50 | −/−/+ | −/−/− |
The peptide’s HLA-A2 binding affinity is analyzed by NetMHC4.0 and IEDB software. The likelihood (rank) of the peptides being processed and presented by MHC molecules is analyzed by NetCTLpan program. The lower the number, the higher the chance of that peptide being processed and presented. The rank of NetMHC4.0 binding affinity is based on 400,000 random natural peptides. The ranks of the peptide being processed and presented is based on 200,000 random natural peptides. The wet laboratory experimental data of cross reactivity is shown in the last column. In the last column where the reactivity is different among TCR1, 2, and 3, their reactivity is indicated as TCR1/TCR2/TCR3.