Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;117(17):9270–9276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919934117

Table 1.

Methodological information about each dataset

Dataset N Obs. Study details Participant details Reference with more information
Type Days Obs./d Context of emotion assessment Mean age, y (SD) Gender, F/M
1 46 604 Daily diary 14 1 That day 45.07 (12.05) 37/9 Van Ryckeghem et al. (37)
2 112 3,091 Daily diary 30 1 That day 34.27 (9.83) 54/58 Dejonckheere et al. (38)
3 112 765 Daily diary 7 1 Most negative event that day 35.23 (11.87) 57/57 Kalokerinos et al. (39)
4 176 29,100 ESM 21 9–10 Momentary 27.15 (9.03) 117/58 Grommisch et al. (40)
5 200 12,085 ESM 7 10 Momentary 18.32 (0.96) 110/90 Erbas et al. (41)
6 96 5,819 ESM 7 10 Momentary 19.05 (1.28) 60/36 Brans et al. (42)
7 79 4,645 ESM 10 7 Momentary 22.18 (5.29) 79 F Holland et al. (43)
8 85 4,946 ESM 14 5 Momentary 23.67 (4.25) 85 F Koval et al. (44)
9 97 5,531 ESM 14 5 Momentary 26.45 (6.06) 97 F Koval et al. (44)
10 100 8,557 ESM 14 7 Momentary 24.12 (6.88) 77/22* Dejonckheere et al. (45)
11 101 8,268 ESM 9 10 Momentary 18.64 (1.45) 87/14 Kalokerinos et al. (46)

Obs., momentary observations.

*

One participant did not specify gender.