Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 17;2012(10):CD004398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub3

10. Comparison group #2, RCT design ‐ categorical, professional practice outcomes.

Study Outcome Control (n/N) Experimental (n/N) Absolute risk difference (95% CI) Standard median effect size
Pre Post Pre Post
Jousimaa 2002 Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (laboratory examinations) NA 1372/1529 NA 1481/1640 0.01 (‐0.02 to 0.03) ‐0.02
Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (radiological examinations) NA 1416/1518 NA 1504/1604 0 (‐0.01 to 0.02)
Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (physical examinations) NA 1461/1545 NA 1494/1610 ‐0.02 (‐0.03 to ‐0.00)
Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (other examinations) NA 248/307 NA 235/314 ‐0.06 (‐0.12 to 0.01)
Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (procedures) NA 140/171 NA 152/196 ‐0.04 (‐0.13 to 0.04)
Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (physiotherapy) NA 83/103 NA 77/98 ‐0.02 (‐0.13 to 0.09)
Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (non‐pharmacological treatments) NA 110/122 NA 80/92 ‐0.03 (‐0.12 to 0.05)
Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (pharmacological treatment) NA 1350/1568 NA 1391/1654 ‐0.02 (‐0.04 to 0.00)
Proportion of consultation decision compliant with guidelines (referrals) NA 1508/1578 NA 1619/1684 0.01 (‐0.01 to 0.02)